All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:40:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120184002.GM7718@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMjc+q5ZEFU4GugJT2RCSmhv48DAA8JzuCxf63eEO6tWVQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [150120 10:27]:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [150119 16:12]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit cb612390e546 ("ARM: dts: Only
> >> build dtb if associated Arch and/or SoC is enabled") from the arm-soc
> >> tree and commit ac7452cee743 ("ARM: dts: Add minimal support for
> >> dm8168-evm") from the omap tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> >> is required).
> >
> > Uhh why is cb612390e546 doing formatting changes all over the place?
> > That's a sure way to produce merge conflicts..
> 
> It's intentional but a but annoying, yes -- we're resolving them as we
> merge in new DT contents so it won't be exposed outside of our tree
> (and -next, unfortunately).

OK. I don't have anything against cleaning up and sorting things to
avoid merge conflicts naturally :)

Maybe for other similar changes you can set up an immutable branch
abainst v3.xx-rc1 with just the clean-up that people can use as
a base without having to bring in all the other changes?

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:40:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120184002.GM7718@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMjc+q5ZEFU4GugJT2RCSmhv48DAA8JzuCxf63eEO6tWVQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [150120 10:27]:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [150119 16:12]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit cb612390e546 ("ARM: dts: Only
> >> build dtb if associated Arch and/or SoC is enabled") from the arm-soc
> >> tree and commit ac7452cee743 ("ARM: dts: Add minimal support for
> >> dm8168-evm") from the omap tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> >> is required).
> >
> > Uhh why is cb612390e546 doing formatting changes all over the place?
> > That's a sure way to produce merge conflicts..
> 
> It's intentional but a but annoying, yes -- we're resolving them as we
> merge in new DT contents so it won't be exposed outside of our tree
> (and -next, unfortunately).

OK. I don't have anything against cleaning up and sorting things to
avoid merge conflicts naturally :)

Maybe for other similar changes you can set up an immutable branch
abainst v3.xx-rc1 with just the clean-up that people can use as
a base without having to bring in all the other changes?

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:40:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120184002.GM7718@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMjc+q5ZEFU4GugJT2RCSmhv48DAA8JzuCxf63eEO6tWVQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [150120 10:27]:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> [150119 16:12]:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit cb612390e546 ("ARM: dts: Only
> >> build dtb if associated Arch and/or SoC is enabled") from the arm-soc
> >> tree and commit ac7452cee743 ("ARM: dts: Add minimal support for
> >> dm8168-evm") from the omap tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> >> is required).
> >
> > Uhh why is cb612390e546 doing formatting changes all over the place?
> > That's a sure way to produce merge conflicts..
> 
> It's intentional but a but annoying, yes -- we're resolving them as we
> merge in new DT contents so it won't be exposed outside of our tree
> (and -next, unfortunately).

OK. I don't have anything against cleaning up and sorting things to
avoid merge conflicts naturally :)

Maybe for other similar changes you can set up an immutable branch
abainst v3.xx-rc1 with just the clean-up that people can use as
a base without having to bring in all the other changes?

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-20 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-20  0:09 linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-20  0:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-20  0:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-20 17:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-20 17:10   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-20 17:10   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-20 18:24   ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-20 18:24     ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-20 18:40     ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-01-20 18:40       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-20 18:40       ` Tony Lindgren
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-09 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-09 22:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-19 10:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-01-19 10:11   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150120184002.GM7718@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=pbrobinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.