From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something that exists
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150122141427.GA3413@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122121819.GC9129@x1>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> Wolfram,
>
> This patch has been on the list since forever.
For reasons :)
a) It was not CCed to the i2c list, so it doesn't show up in patchwork
which does the patch tracking for me.
b) I was always under the impression that Maxime is going to take it?
He said so.
> I have Acks from the driver author, so I'm going to take this through
> the MFD tree. If you perk up later and decide to take it though the
> I2C tree instead, let me know and I'll remove it from MFD.
Well, I2C makes more sense than MFD, so I'll pick it up right now.
ST-tree would have also been fine.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150122/06a2b530/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something that exists
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150122141427.GA3413@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122121819.GC9129@x1>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 660 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> Wolfram,
>
> This patch has been on the list since forever.
For reasons :)
a) It was not CCed to the i2c list, so it doesn't show up in patchwork
which does the patch tracking for me.
b) I was always under the impression that Maxime is going to take it?
He said so.
> I have Acks from the driver author, so I'm going to take this through
> the MFD tree. If you perk up later and decide to take it though the
> I2C tree instead, let me know and I'll remove it from MFD.
Well, I2C makes more sense than MFD, so I'll pick it up right now.
ST-tree would have also been fine.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something that exists
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150122141427.GA3413@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122121819.GC9129@x1>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 660 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> Wolfram,
>
> This patch has been on the list since forever.
For reasons :)
a) It was not CCed to the i2c list, so it doesn't show up in patchwork
which does the patch tracking for me.
b) I was always under the impression that Maxime is going to take it?
He said so.
> I have Acks from the driver author, so I'm going to take this through
> the MFD tree. If you perk up later and decide to take it though the
> I2C tree instead, let me know and I'll remove it from MFD.
Well, I2C makes more sense than MFD, so I'll pick it up right now.
ST-tree would have also been fine.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-28 14:02 [PATCH 1/1] i2c: i2c-st: Rename clock reference to something that exists Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-28 14:31 ` [STLinux Kernel] " Maxime Coquelin
2014-08-28 14:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2014-08-28 14:31 ` Maxime Coquelin
2015-01-21 15:26 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-21 15:26 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 9:34 ` Peter Griffin
2015-01-22 9:34 ` Peter Griffin
2015-01-22 9:34 ` Peter Griffin
2015-01-22 12:18 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 12:18 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 14:14 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-01-22 14:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-22 14:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-22 14:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 14:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 14:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-22 14:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-22 14:18 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150122141427.GA3413@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.