From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
To: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Making udev emit a signal when it is done loading modules
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:38:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128013852.GA8177@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150117160319.GO18247@in.waw.pl>
On Sat, 17.01.15 17:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:44:00AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > We would like
> > udev to emit a signal (ABI to be discussed) when it is done
> > trying to load modules for everything which was already enumerated
> > when it starts, iow when there are no new device events pending
> > anymore when udev does its initial hotplug replay.
> I think you can just create a unit like:
>
> # disable-new-hardware.service
> [Unit]
> After=systemd-udev-settle.service systemd-modules-load.service
> Wants=systemd-udev-settle.service
>
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> RemainAfterExit=yes
> ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/ping-the-kernel
>
> > So the question to you is would you be willing to include such
> > functionality in udev?
> I don't think udevd has enough knowledge. But a systemd unit like
> the one above should work.
To clarify this: if people do this, then this pulls in
systemd-udev-settle.service, which slows down boot. Every service that
does that is hence a majour source of slowness.
It's a hack to use this, not a solution.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lennart@poettering.net (Lennart Poettering)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [systemd-devel] Making udev emit a signal when it is done loading modules
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:38:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150128013852.GA8177@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150117160319.GO18247@in.waw.pl>
On Sat, 17.01.15 17:03, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek at in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:44:00AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > We would like
> > udev to emit a signal (ABI to be discussed) when it is done
> > trying to load modules for everything which was already enumerated
> > when it starts, iow when there are no new device events pending
> > anymore when udev does its initial hotplug replay.
> I think you can just create a unit like:
>
> # disable-new-hardware.service
> [Unit]
> After=systemd-udev-settle.service systemd-modules-load.service
> Wants=systemd-udev-settle.service
>
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> RemainAfterExit=yes
> ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/ping-the-kernel
>
> > So the question to you is would you be willing to include such
> > functionality in udev?
> I don't think udevd has enough knowledge. But a systemd unit like
> the one above should work.
To clarify this: if people do this, then this pulls in
systemd-udev-settle.service, which slows down boot. Every service that
does that is hence a majour source of slowness.
It's a hack to use this, not a solution.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-28 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-17 8:44 Making udev emit a signal when it is done loading modules Hans de Goede
2015-01-17 8:44 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-17 13:56 ` Greg KH
2015-01-17 13:56 ` [systemd-devel] " Greg KH
2015-01-17 14:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 14:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-01-17 14:52 ` Hans de Goede
2015-01-17 14:52 ` [systemd-devel] " Hans de Goede
[not found] ` <20150117135630.GA25585-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-17 15:23 ` jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2015-01-17 15:23 ` jonsmirl at gmail.com
2015-01-17 16:03 ` David Herrmann
2015-01-17 16:03 ` David Herrmann
2015-01-17 16:03 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2015-01-17 16:03 ` [systemd-devel] " Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2015-01-17 16:45 ` Kay Sievers
2015-01-17 16:45 ` Kay Sievers
2015-01-28 1:38 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2015-01-28 1:38 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-02-11 5:28 ` Mark Brown
2015-02-11 5:28 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150128013852.GA8177@gardel-login \
--to=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=zbyszek@in.waw.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.