All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop: power off until vop standby take effect
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:53:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202075337.GN14009@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CEE131.1020600@rock-chips.com>

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015年02月02日 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >Hi Mark, Heiko,
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >>Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
> >>if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
> >>
> >>we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> >>if not, memory bus maybe dead.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
> >>         /* mutex vsync_ work */
> >>         struct mutex vsync_mutex;
> >>         bool vsync_work_pending;
> >>+       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
> >>
> >>         const struct vop_data *data;
> >>
> >>@@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
> >>         }
> >>  }
> >>
> >>+static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
> >>+{
> >>+       unsigned long flags;
> >>+
> >>+       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> >Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
> >
> >If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
> >write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
> >crash dump than the hang.
>   In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
> will hang system, and the WARN_ON

if (WARN_ON(cond))
	return;

is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.

The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
horrible, I looked ...).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop: power off until vop standby take effect
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:53:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202075337.GN14009@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CEE131.1020600@rock-chips.com>

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:30:09AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
> On 2015年02月02日 10:07, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> >Hi Mark, Heiko,
> >
> >On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >>Vop standby will take effect end of current frame,
> >>if dsp_hold_valid_irq happen, it means vop standby complete.
> >>
> >>we must wait standby complete when we want to disable aclk,
> >>if not, memory bus maybe dead.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>index fb25836..47ea61f 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> >>@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct vop {
> >>         /* mutex vsync_ work */
> >>         struct mutex vsync_mutex;
> >>         bool vsync_work_pending;
> >>+       struct completion dsp_hold_completion;
> >>
> >>         const struct vop_data *data;
> >>
> >>@@ -382,6 +383,34 @@ static bool is_alpha_support(uint32_t format)
> >>         }
> >>  }
> >>
> >>+static void vop_dsp_hold_valid_irq_enable(struct vop *vop)
> >>+{
> >>+       unsigned long flags;
> >>+
> >>+       BUG_ON(!vop->is_enabled);
> >Re: Heiko "use a WARN_ON":
> >
> >If the VOP clock is off, then the system will just hang when trying to
> >write the VOP register so in this case, BUG_ON gives a more reliable
> >crash dump than the hang.
>   In this way, you are right, if vop clocks is disabled, write vop register
> will hang system, and the WARN_ON

if (WARN_ON(cond))
	return;

is what we commonly use in i915. Because it's really not any good to use
BUG_ON in drm drivers, at least if you expect anyone to use fbcon on top
of it (i.e. anything even remotely resembling a normal distro): Then the
intial modeset is all done under console_lock, which means that _none_ of
your BUG_ON will ever get out over serial console.

The problem is fbcon locking, but no fool yet signed up to fix it (it's
horrible, I looked ...).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-31  8:41 [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop: power off until vop standby take effect Mark Yao
2015-01-31  8:41 ` Mark Yao
2015-01-31 12:49 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-01-31 12:49   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-02-02  0:45   ` Mark yao
2015-02-02  0:45     ` Mark yao
2015-02-02  2:07 ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-02-02  2:07   ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-02-02  2:30   ` Mark yao
2015-02-02  2:30     ` Mark yao
2015-02-02  7:53     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-02-02  7:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-04  3:38       ` Mark yao
2015-02-04  3:38         ` Mark yao
2015-02-04  3:48         ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-02-04  3:48           ` Daniel Kurtz
2015-02-04  3:56           ` Mark yao
2015-02-04  3:56             ` Mark yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150202075337.GN14009@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.yao@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.