All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	a.ryabinin@samsung.com, x86@kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com, davej@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, waiman.long@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:14:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150209151459.GA973@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423485611-18369-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 02/09, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> +static inline void __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	arch_spinlock_t old, new;
> +	__ticket_t diff;
> +
> +	old.tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +	diff = (old.tickets.tail & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) - old.tickets.head;
> +
> +	/* try to clear slowpath flag when there are no contenders */
> +	if ((old.tickets.tail & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) &&
> +		(diff == TICKET_LOCK_INC)) {
> +		new = old;
> +		new.tickets.tail &= ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;
> +		cmpxchg(&lock->head_tail, old.head_tail, new.head_tail);
> +	}
> +}

Can't we simplify it? We own .head, and we already know it. We only need
to clear TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG in .tail atomically?

IOW,

	static inline void __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock, __ticket_t head)
	{
		__ticket_t old_tail, new_tail;

		new_tail = head + TICKET_LOCK_INC;
		old_tail = new_tail | TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;

		if (READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.tail) == old_tail)
			cmpxchg(&lock->tickets.tail, old_tail, new_tail);
	}

Plus

	-	__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(lock);
	+	__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(lock, inc.tail);

Or I missed something?

And I think it would be better to avoid ifdef(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS),
ww can just do

	if (TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG)
		__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath();

Oleg.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@hp.com, davej@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, riel@redhat.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	a.ryabinin@samsung.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:14:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150209151459.GA973@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423485611-18369-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 02/09, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
> +static inline void __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	arch_spinlock_t old, new;
> +	__ticket_t diff;
> +
> +	old.tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +	diff = (old.tickets.tail & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) - old.tickets.head;
> +
> +	/* try to clear slowpath flag when there are no contenders */
> +	if ((old.tickets.tail & TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG) &&
> +		(diff == TICKET_LOCK_INC)) {
> +		new = old;
> +		new.tickets.tail &= ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;
> +		cmpxchg(&lock->head_tail, old.head_tail, new.head_tail);
> +	}
> +}

Can't we simplify it? We own .head, and we already know it. We only need
to clear TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG in .tail atomically?

IOW,

	static inline void __ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock, __ticket_t head)
	{
		__ticket_t old_tail, new_tail;

		new_tail = head + TICKET_LOCK_INC;
		old_tail = new_tail | TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG;

		if (READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.tail) == old_tail)
			cmpxchg(&lock->tickets.tail, old_tail, new_tail);
	}

Plus

	-	__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(lock);
	+	__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath(lock, inc.tail);

Or I missed something?

And I think it would be better to avoid ifdef(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS),
ww can just do

	if (TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG)
		__ticket_check_and_clear_slowpath();

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-09 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-09 12:40 [PATCH V2] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-02-09 15:14   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-09 17:03   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 17:03   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 17:03   ` Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-09 12:40 Raghavendra K T
2015-02-09 12:40 Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150209151459.GA973@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.