From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:52:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150213155208.GG10496@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DA725E.6080305@codeaurora.org>
[...]
> > Aside: For that last row we really should be setting cpu->hotpluggable
> > in struct cpu based on what cpu_ops::cpu_disable returns (from what I
> > can tell we use that op to indicate if a CPU can be hotplugged).
> >
>
> There's a patch for that (tm).
>
> ----8<----
>
> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable
>
> Writes to /sys/.../cpuX/online fail if we determine the platform
> doesn't support hotplug for that CPU. Let's figure this out
> befoer we make the sysfs nodes so that the online file doesn't
> even exist if it's not possible to hotplug the CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 11 ++++-------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> index 18f5a554134f..9f82430efd59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -123,4 +123,10 @@ struct of_cpu_method {
> */
> extern void smp_set_ops(struct smp_operations *);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +extern int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +#else
> +static inline int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* ifndef __ASM_ARM_SMP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 715ae19bc7c8..c61c09defc78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct cpuinfo_arm *cpuinfo = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
> - cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
> + cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = platform_can_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
> register_cpu(&cpuinfo->cpu, cpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index fe0386c751b2..4d213b24db60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -174,18 +174,19 @@ static int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static int platform_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> +int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> if (smp_ops.cpu_disable)
> - return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu);
> + return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu) ? 0 : 1;
>
> /*
> * By default, allow disabling all CPUs except the first one,
> * since this is special on a lot of platforms, e.g. because
> * of clock tick interrupts.
> */
> - return cpu == 0 ? -EPERM : 0;
> + return cpu == 0 ? 0 : 1;
> }
> +
> /*
> * __cpu_disable runs on the processor to be shutdown.
> */
> @@ -194,10 +195,6 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> int ret;
>
> - ret = platform_cpu_disable(cpu);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
For PSCI 0.2+ I was hoping to hook the MIGRATE logic in here. The secure
side may reject hotplugging of a CPU, but it's a dynamic property of the
system and so can't be probed once at boot time.
I guess when I manage to get around to that I can restore a hook here.
Thanks,
Mark.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:52:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150213155208.GG10496@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DA725E.6080305@codeaurora.org>
[...]
> > Aside: For that last row we really should be setting cpu->hotpluggable
> > in struct cpu based on what cpu_ops::cpu_disable returns (from what I
> > can tell we use that op to indicate if a CPU can be hotplugged).
> >
>
> There's a patch for that (tm).
>
> ----8<----
>
> From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable
>
> Writes to /sys/.../cpuX/online fail if we determine the platform
> doesn't support hotplug for that CPU. Let's figure this out
> befoer we make the sysfs nodes so that the online file doesn't
> even exist if it's not possible to hotplug the CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 11 ++++-------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> index 18f5a554134f..9f82430efd59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -123,4 +123,10 @@ struct of_cpu_method {
> */
> extern void smp_set_ops(struct smp_operations *);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +extern int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> +#else
> +static inline int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* ifndef __ASM_ARM_SMP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index 715ae19bc7c8..c61c09defc78 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -974,7 +974,7 @@ static int __init topology_init(void)
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> struct cpuinfo_arm *cpuinfo = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
> - cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = 1;
> + cpuinfo->cpu.hotpluggable = platform_can_hotplug_cpu(cpu);
> register_cpu(&cpuinfo->cpu, cpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> index fe0386c751b2..4d213b24db60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -174,18 +174,19 @@ static int platform_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static int platform_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> +int platform_can_hotplug_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> if (smp_ops.cpu_disable)
> - return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu);
> + return smp_ops.cpu_disable(cpu) ? 0 : 1;
>
> /*
> * By default, allow disabling all CPUs except the first one,
> * since this is special on a lot of platforms, e.g. because
> * of clock tick interrupts.
> */
> - return cpu == 0 ? -EPERM : 0;
> + return cpu == 0 ? 0 : 1;
> }
> +
> /*
> * __cpu_disable runs on the processor to be shutdown.
> */
> @@ -194,10 +195,6 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
> unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> int ret;
>
> - ret = platform_cpu_disable(cpu);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
For PSCI 0.2+ I was hoping to hook the MIGRATE logic in here. The secure
side may reject hotplugging of a CPU, but it's a dynamic property of the
system and so can't be probed once at boot time.
I guess when I manage to get around to that I can restore a hook here.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-13 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 10:14 [PATCH v2] ARM: Don't use complete() during __cpu_die Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 10:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 11:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:28 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:28 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 14:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 14:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 17:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 17:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-05 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-05 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 1:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 1:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 1:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 1:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 2:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 2:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 3:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 3:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-10 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 15:14 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 20:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 21:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 21:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 21:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:52 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-02-13 15:52 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 16:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 17:21 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 17:21 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 17:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 17:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-13 16:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 16:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-13 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-13 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-10 20:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 20:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 15:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 15:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-10 18:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-10 18:33 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-25 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 17:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 17:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-25 18:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 18:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 20:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-25 20:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-26 1:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-26 1:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-22 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-22 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 12:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 12:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 13:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 13:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 14:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 14:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-23 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-23 16:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-26 19:14 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-02-26 19:14 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-02-26 19:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-26 19:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-05 10:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 10:53 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 10:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-02-05 10:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150213155208.GG10496@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.