From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
davem@davemloft.net, mpe@ellerman.id.au, deller@gmx.de,
hpa@zytor.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, "lizefan@huawei.com" <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>,
ralf@linux-mips.org,
"dingtianhong@huawei.com" <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:22:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150214112220.GB10246@MBP.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DE730D.3090100@ezchip.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>index e299de396e9b..32601939a3c8 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>@@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_TIMER:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_tid, &to->si_tid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_overrun, &to->si_overrun);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr,
> >>- &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_POLL:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_band, &to->si_band);
> >>@@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_MESGQ: /* But this is */
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_pid, &to->si_pid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_uid, &to->si_uid);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr, &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_SYS:
> >> err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)
>
> I must be confused here, but I don't see that these do anything different.
>
> If we are writing 32 bits to to->si_ptr or to->si_int, either way the high 32 bits
> are irrelevant. So whether we read it from from->si_ptr and massage the high bits,
> or just read it from from->si_int as a straight-up 32-bit quantity, either way it
> seems we should end up writing the same bits to userspace.
>
> I would understand the argument if we were overlaying the si_ptr/si_int union
> from a kernel-side siginfo_t where si_ptr and si_int are different sizes
> onto userspace, but it doesn't seem we ever do that.
That's the problem, "from" above is a kernel siginfo_t while "to" is a
compat_siginfo_t. The call paths go something like:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of 64-bit sival_ptr is zeroed by a memset in this
function (this other half can be top or bottom, depending on
endianness)
3. signal is about to be delivered to user via arch code. The
compat_ptr(from->si_ptr) conversion always takes the least
significant part of the native si_ptr. On big endian 64-bit, this is
zero because get_compat_sigevent() populated the top part of si_ptr
with si_int.
So delivering such signals to compat user always sets si_int to 0.
Little endian is fine.
A similar example is sys_timer_create() which takes a sigevent argument.
Maybe Bamvor has a test case.
(btw, I'm off for a week, I'll follow up when I get back)
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, deller@gmx.de,
"dingtianhong@huawei.com" <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
jejb@parisc-linux.org, "lizefan@huawei.com" <lizefan@huawei.com>,
paulus@samba.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, hpa@zytor.com,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:22:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150214112220.GB10246@MBP.local> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150214112223.CLHoLOV4tBrU1VFtnX3pyNvOS0GmgsGR72qWCzcxFK0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DE730D.3090100@ezchip.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>index e299de396e9b..32601939a3c8 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>@@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_TIMER:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_tid, &to->si_tid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_overrun, &to->si_overrun);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr,
> >>- &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_POLL:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_band, &to->si_band);
> >>@@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_MESGQ: /* But this is */
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_pid, &to->si_pid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_uid, &to->si_uid);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr, &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_SYS:
> >> err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)
>
> I must be confused here, but I don't see that these do anything different.
>
> If we are writing 32 bits to to->si_ptr or to->si_int, either way the high 32 bits
> are irrelevant. So whether we read it from from->si_ptr and massage the high bits,
> or just read it from from->si_int as a straight-up 32-bit quantity, either way it
> seems we should end up writing the same bits to userspace.
>
> I would understand the argument if we were overlaying the si_ptr/si_int union
> from a kernel-side siginfo_t where si_ptr and si_int are different sizes
> onto userspace, but it doesn't seem we ever do that.
That's the problem, "from" above is a kernel siginfo_t while "to" is a
compat_siginfo_t. The call paths go something like:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of 64-bit sival_ptr is zeroed by a memset in this
function (this other half can be top or bottom, depending on
endianness)
3. signal is about to be delivered to user via arch code. The
compat_ptr(from->si_ptr) conversion always takes the least
significant part of the native si_ptr. On big endian 64-bit, this is
zero because get_compat_sigevent() populated the top part of si_ptr
with si_int.
So delivering such signals to compat user always sets si_int to 0.
Little endian is fine.
A similar example is sys_timer_create() which takes a sigevent argument.
Maybe Bamvor has a test case.
(btw, I'm off for a week, I'll follow up when I get back)
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:22:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150214112220.GB10246@MBP.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DE730D.3090100@ezchip.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>index e299de396e9b..32601939a3c8 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>@@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_TIMER:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_tid, &to->si_tid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_overrun, &to->si_overrun);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr,
> >>- &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_POLL:
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_band, &to->si_band);
> >>@@ -184,7 +183,7 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginfo_t __user *to, const siginfo_t *from)
> >> case __SI_MESGQ: /* But this is */
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_pid, &to->si_pid);
> >> err |= __put_user(from->si_uid, &to->si_uid);
> >>- err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)from->si_ptr, &to->si_ptr);
> >>+ err |= __put_user(from->si_int, &to->si_int);
> >> break;
> >> case __SI_SYS:
> >> err |= __put_user((compat_uptr_t)(unsigned long)
>
> I must be confused here, but I don't see that these do anything different.
>
> If we are writing 32 bits to to->si_ptr or to->si_int, either way the high 32 bits
> are irrelevant. So whether we read it from from->si_ptr and massage the high bits,
> or just read it from from->si_int as a straight-up 32-bit quantity, either way it
> seems we should end up writing the same bits to userspace.
>
> I would understand the argument if we were overlaying the si_ptr/si_int union
> from a kernel-side siginfo_t where si_ptr and si_int are different sizes
> onto userspace, but it doesn't seem we ever do that.
That's the problem, "from" above is a kernel siginfo_t while "to" is a
compat_siginfo_t. The call paths go something like:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of 64-bit sival_ptr is zeroed by a memset in this
function (this other half can be top or bottom, depending on
endianness)
3. signal is about to be delivered to user via arch code. The
compat_ptr(from->si_ptr) conversion always takes the least
significant part of the native si_ptr. On big endian 64-bit, this is
zero because get_compat_sigevent() populated the top part of si_ptr
with si_int.
So delivering such signals to compat user always sets si_int to 0.
Little endian is fine.
A similar example is sys_timer_create() which takes a sigevent argument.
Maybe Bamvor has a test case.
(btw, I'm off for a week, I'll follow up when I get back)
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-14 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-10 10:10 [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval Zhang Jian(Bamvor)
2015-02-10 10:10 ` Zhang Jian(Bamvor)
2015-02-10 12:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-10 12:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-11 11:22 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-11 11:22 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-11 11:22 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-11 15:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-11 15:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-13 8:00 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-13 8:00 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-13 8:00 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-13 10:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-13 10:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-13 21:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-13 21:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-13 21:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-14 11:22 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2015-02-14 11:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-14 11:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-17 6:42 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-17 6:42 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-17 6:42 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-21 4:05 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-21 4:05 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-21 4:05 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-21 4:05 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-24 21:54 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-24 21:54 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-24 21:54 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-24 21:54 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-25 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-02-25 10:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-16 19:04 ` [PATCH] tile: use si_int instead of si_ptr for compat_siginfo Chris Metcalf
2015-03-16 19:04 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-16 19:04 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-23 12:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-23 12:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-24 20:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 20:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 20:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-17 16:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-17 16:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-04-17 16:56 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-02-17 7:15 ` [PATCH] compat: Fix endian issue in union sigval Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-17 7:15 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-17 7:15 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
2015-02-17 7:15 ` Bamvor Jian Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150214112220.GB10246@MBP.local \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.