From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: micky_ching@realsil.com.cn
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rogerable@realtek.com, wei_wang@realsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/9] mfd: rtsx: update phy register
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:07:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216140720.GK14545@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b071b30b7457b83abe172c348262345faa332ff7.1421911636.git.micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, micky_ching@realsil.com.cn wrote:
> From: Micky Ching <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
>
> update phy register value and using direct value instead of macros.
> It is much easier to debug using constant value than a lot of macros.
> We usually need compare the value directly to check the configure.
This is no longer an adequate description of the patch.
> Signed-off-by: Micky Ching <micky_ching@realsil.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/rts5249.c | 55 ++++++++++++----------
> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> index 2fe2854..d8072f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rts5249.c
> @@ -132,57 +132,62 @@ static int rts5249_optimize_phy(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> - err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_REG_REV,
> - PHY_REG_REV_RESV | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_LATCHED |
> - PHY_REG_REV_P1_EN | PHY_REG_REV_RXIDLE_EN |
> - PHY_REG_REV_RX_PWST | PHY_REG_REV_CLKREQ_DLY_TIMER_1_0 |
> - PHY_REG_REV_STOP_CLKRD | PHY_REG_REV_STOP_CLKWR);
> + err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_REV,
> + PHY_REV_RESV | PHY_REV_RXIDLE_LATCHED |
> + PHY_REV_P1_EN | PHY_REV_RXIDLE_EN |
> + PHY_REV_CLKREQ_TX_EN | PHY_REV_RX_PWST |
> + PHY_REV_CLKREQ_DT_1_0 | PHY_REV_STOP_CLKRD |
> + PHY_REV_STOP_CLKWR);
The tabbing changes make it difficult to see what you're _really_
doing. If you think the tabs are important (I think they were better
before personally), then send them as a separate patch.
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> msleep(1);
>
> err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_BPCR,
> - PHY_BPCR_IBRXSEL | PHY_BPCR_IBTXSEL |
> - PHY_BPCR_IB_FILTER | PHY_BPCR_CMIRROR_EN);
> + PHY_BPCR_IBRXSEL | PHY_BPCR_IBTXSEL |
> + PHY_BPCR_IB_FILTER | PHY_BPCR_CMIRROR_EN);
More nonsense?
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
> +
> err = rtsx_pci_write_phy_register(pcr, PHY_PCR,
> - PHY_PCR_FORCE_CODE | PHY_PCR_OOBS_CALI_50 |
> - PHY_PCR_OOBS_VCM_08 | PHY_PCR_OOBS_SEN_90 |
> - PHY_PCR_RSSI_EN);
> + PHY_PCR_FORCE_CODE | PHY_PCR_OOBS_CALI_50 |
> + PHY_PCR_OOBS_VCM_08 | PHY_PCR_OOBS_SEN_90 |
> + PHY_PCR_RSSI_EN | PHY_PCR_RX10K);
Etc.
I'm going to stop here. Please resubmit this patch properly.
[...]
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 7:30 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/9] mfd: rtsx: add support for new rts524A and rts525A micky_ching
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/9] mfd: rtsx: replace TAB by SPC after #define micky_ching
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/9] mfd: rtsx: place register address and values togather micky_ching
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/9] mfd: rtsx: update PETXCFG address micky_ching
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 4/9] mfd: rtsx: update driving settings micky_ching
2015-01-22 7:40 ` Joe Perches
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 5/9] mfd: rtsx: update phy register micky_ching
2015-02-16 14:07 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 6/9] mfd: rtsx: remove LCTLR defination micky_ching
2015-02-16 14:31 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 7/9] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts524A micky_ching
2015-02-02 1:07 ` 敬锐
2015-02-02 8:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 14:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-25 3:27 ` 敬锐
2015-02-25 7:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 8/9] mfd: rtsx: add support for rts525A micky_ching
2015-02-16 14:37 ` Lee Jones
2015-01-22 7:30 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 9/9] mfd: rtsx: using pcr_dbg replace dev_dbg micky_ching
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216140720.GK14545@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=micky_ching@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=rogerable@realtek.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.