From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"boaz@plexistor.com" <boaz@plexistor.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"mm-commits@vger.kernel.org" <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: + ext4-add-dax-functionality.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:59:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150218215922.GA2285@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218215523.GO12722@dastard>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> And speaking of phony BHs, the pnfs block layout changes introduce
> an struct iomap and a "map_blocks" method to the export_ops in
> exportfs.h. This is the model what we should be using instead of
> phony BHs for block mapping/allocation operations...
I've got some WIP patches to move the direct I/O code over to that,
DAX would be another natural fit.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"boaz@plexistor.com" <boaz@plexistor.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"mm-commits@vger.kernel.org" <mm-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: + ext4-add-dax-functionality.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:59:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150218215922.GA2285@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218215523.GO12722@dastard>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 08:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> And speaking of phony BHs, the pnfs block layout changes introduce
> an struct iomap and a "map_blocks" method to the export_ops in
> exportfs.h. This is the model what we should be using instead of
> phony BHs for block mapping/allocation operations...
I've got some WIP patches to move the direct I/O code over to that,
DAX would be another natural fit.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-18 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-12 23:11 + ext4-add-dax-functionality.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2015-01-15 12:41 ` Jan Kara
2015-01-16 21:16 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2015-01-19 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2015-01-19 14:18 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-17 8:52 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-17 8:52 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-17 13:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-02-17 13:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-02-18 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-18 10:40 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-18 21:55 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-18 21:59 ` hch [this message]
2015-02-18 21:59 ` hch
2015-02-19 15:42 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-19 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-19 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-19 23:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-19 23:08 ` Dave Chinner
2015-02-20 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-20 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-20 22:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-02-20 22:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-02-23 12:52 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-23 12:52 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150218215922.GA2285@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.