Re: [PATCH v2] extcon: otg_gpio: add driver for USB OTG port controlled by GPIO(s)

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1736 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:02:26AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > As always, comments are welcome.
> > 
> > Are nits welcome too?
> > 
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
> > 
> > You probably meant
> >     MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2")
> > 
> > Didn't that trigger a warning or error?
> 
> checkpatch showed no warning about that, not even with --strict option.
> I believe both ways are fine. But I can add the space.

Documentation says it should be with space:

/*
 * The following license idents are currently accepted as indicating free
 * software modules
 *
 *	"GPL"				[GNU Public License v2 or later]
 *	"GPL v2"			[GNU Public License v2]
 *	"GPL and additional rights"	[GNU Public License v2 rights and more]
 *	"Dual BSD/GPL"			[GNU Public License v2
 *					 or BSD license choice]
 *	"Dual MIT/GPL"			[GNU Public License v2
 *					 or MIT license choice]
 *	"Dual MPL/GPL"			[GNU Public License v2
 *					 or Mozilla license choice]
 *
 * The following other idents are available
 *
 *	"Proprietary"			[Non free products]
 *
 * There are dual licensed components, but when running with Linux it is the
 * GPL that is relevant so this is a non issue. Similarly LGPL linked with GPL
 * is a GPL combined work.
 *
 * This exists for several reasons
 * 1.	So modinfo can show license info for users wanting to vet their setup
 *	is free
 * 2.	So the community can ignore bug reports including proprietary modules
 * 3.	So vendors can do likewise based on their own policies
 */
#define MODULE_LICENSE(_license) MODULE_INFO(license, _license)

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]