All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@mm-sol.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 00:19:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150303081958.GA6293@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424967957.2340.30.camel@mm-sol.com>

On 02/26, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> 
> Hi Stephan, 
> 
> Sorry for delayed answer.
> 
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 16:49 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 02/03/15 04:17, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > Following set of patches add initial DT support for PMIC devices
> > > found on recent Quqalcomm chipsets. Details for SPMI bus and PMIC arbiter
> > > could be found here [1].
> > 
> > Can you please put the specific compatible strings for the pmic model
> > into the nodes in addition to the generic "qcom,spmi-pmic"? We may want
> > to have regmap config tables in the future that describe the
> > cache/read/write abilities of the regsiters. If all we have is the
> > generic binding then we don't have a way to populate these tables.
> > Unless the plan there is to use the revid registers?
> > 
> 
> I would really like that we can use "revid" registers, but I don't know... 
> 
> From what I can see usually in one physical PMIC chip they
> are 2 USID devices.
> 
> I can successfully discover following USID's on APQ8074 boards:
> 
> pmic-spmi 0-00: qcom,pm8941-v1.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-01: qcom,pm8941-v1.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-04: qcom,pm8841-v0.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-05: qcom,pm8841-v0.0 detected
> 
> Unfortunately on PM8916 only one device is detected, with USID 0.
> But they should be two, judging by downstream DTS files, right?
> 
> pmic-spmi 0-00: qcom,pm8916-v0.0 detected 
> pmic-spmi 0-01: unknown device
> 
> For communication with PM8916 I am using recent patches from Gilad [1].
> Maybe there are still some issues with these patches, which can cause
> this behavior or PM8916 just didn't have these registers for USID 1?
> 
> Regards,
> Ivan 

Hmm... do you have 4 total rev-id nodes on apq8074? I only see
one rev-id node per pmic (2 total), so I'm a little lost how the
correct pmic version is detected on the 0-01 and 0-05 devices in
your example above. Maybe I've missed something though, I'll have
to check in a few hours when I'm in the office.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 00:19:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150303081958.GA6293@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424967957.2340.30.camel@mm-sol.com>

On 02/26, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> 
> Hi Stephan, 
> 
> Sorry for delayed answer.
> 
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 16:49 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 02/03/15 04:17, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> > > Following set of patches add initial DT support for PMIC devices
> > > found on recent Quqalcomm chipsets. Details for SPMI bus and PMIC arbiter
> > > could be found here [1].
> > 
> > Can you please put the specific compatible strings for the pmic model
> > into the nodes in addition to the generic "qcom,spmi-pmic"? We may want
> > to have regmap config tables in the future that describe the
> > cache/read/write abilities of the regsiters. If all we have is the
> > generic binding then we don't have a way to populate these tables.
> > Unless the plan there is to use the revid registers?
> > 
> 
> I would really like that we can use "revid" registers, but I don't know... 
> 
> From what I can see usually in one physical PMIC chip they
> are 2 USID devices.
> 
> I can successfully discover following USID's on APQ8074 boards:
> 
> pmic-spmi 0-00: qcom,pm8941-v1.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-01: qcom,pm8941-v1.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-04: qcom,pm8841-v0.0 detected
> pmic-spmi 0-05: qcom,pm8841-v0.0 detected
> 
> Unfortunately on PM8916 only one device is detected, with USID 0.
> But they should be two, judging by downstream DTS files, right?
> 
> pmic-spmi 0-00: qcom,pm8916-v0.0 detected 
> pmic-spmi 0-01: unknown device
> 
> For communication with PM8916 I am using recent patches from Gilad [1].
> Maybe there are still some issues with these patches, which can cause
> this behavior or PM8916 just didn't have these registers for USID 1?
> 
> Regards,
> Ivan 

Hmm... do you have 4 total rev-id nodes on apq8074? I only see
one rev-id node per pmic (2 total), so I'm a little lost how the
correct pmic version is detected on the 0-01 and 0-05 devices in
your example above. Maybe I've missed something though, I'll have
to check in a few hours when I'm in the office.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 12:17 [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
     [not found] ` <1422965880-11047-1-git-send-email-iivanov-NEYub+7Iv8PQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-03 12:17   ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974 Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2018-08-31 22:46     ` Frank Rowand
2018-08-31 22:46       ` Frank Rowand
2018-08-31 22:50       ` Frank Rowand
2018-08-31 22:50         ` Frank Rowand
2018-08-31 23:01       ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-08-31 23:01         ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-09-01  0:05         ` Frank Rowand
2018-09-01  0:05           ` Frank Rowand
2015-02-03 20:38   ` [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices Bjorn Andersson
2015-02-03 20:38     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-02-03 20:38     ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-02-10  7:17     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-10  7:17       ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add 8x74 chipset SPMI PMIC's nodes Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:17   ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add APQ8084 " Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-03 12:18   ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-10 21:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add initial DT support for Qualcomm SPMI PMIC devices Andy Gross
2015-02-10 21:58   ` Andy Gross
2015-02-20  0:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-02-20  0:49   ` Stephen Boyd
     [not found]   ` <54E6848C.1090405-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-02-26 16:25     ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-26 16:25       ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-02-26 16:25       ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-03-03  8:19       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-03-03  8:19         ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-04 10:31         ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-03-04 10:31           ` Ivan T. Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150303081958.GA6293@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=iivanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.