From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Use generic compat audit code
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:14:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304051402.GC5158@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425439896-8322-5-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>
* Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> Use the generic compat syscall audit code instead of an x86 specific
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +--
> arch/x86/ia32/Makefile | 3 --
> arch/x86/ia32/audit.c | 43 ---------------------
> arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c | 82 -----------------------------------------
> 6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/ia32/audit.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c
Nice!
Because there are many types of conversions it would be nice if the
changelog included a declaration of some sorts about what this means
precisely: 'the two implementations were 100% identical', or 'the x86
one was buggy and we now switch to the correct generic one', or 'the
only difference between the two is X, Y and Z, which is not a
problem'?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-04 3:31 [PATCH 0/5] x86: IA32 emulation cleanups Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 3:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86: Remove compat_ni_syscall() Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 5:27 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/compat: " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 3:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: Merge native and compat 32-bit syscall tables Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 5:27 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/compat: " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 3:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Remove sys32_vm86_warning Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 5:28 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/compat: " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 3:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Use generic compat audit code Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 5:14 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-04 6:39 ` Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04 14:52 ` David Drysdale
2015-03-04 3:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86: Clean up ia32/Makefile Brian Gerst
2015-03-04 5:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] x86: IA32 emulation cleanups Ingo Molnar
2015-03-04 6:22 ` Brian Gerst
2015-03-05 22:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304051402.GC5158@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.