From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150306170708.GR3989@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AB034DC5-9E4C-4883-BBF0-B93B438C7A54@jcrosoft.com>
On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> >
> > Sorry but NACK.
> >
> > I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real
> > benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late.
>
> yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical
>
> so I?ll pass on the NACK
>
If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and
completely drop the current mess?
> >
> > Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by
> > multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our
> > current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example).
> >
>
> Others already do so and this is not complex at all
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Nicolas FERRE
<nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Boris BREZILLON
<boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 18:07:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150306170708.GR3989@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AB034DC5-9E4C-4883-BBF0-B93B438C7A54-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> >
> > Sorry but NACK.
> >
> > I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real
> > benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late.
>
> yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical
>
> so I’ll pass on the NACK
>
If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and
completely drop the current mess?
> >
> > Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by
> > multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our
> > current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example).
> >
>
> Others already do so and this is not complex at all
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 9:34 [PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-26 9:34 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-26 10:43 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-26 10:43 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-02-26 11:03 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-02-26 11:03 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-06 15:08 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-06 15:08 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-03-06 16:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-06 16:49 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-06 17:07 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-03-06 17:07 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-06 18:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-03-06 18:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-03-06 18:33 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-06 18:33 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-03-17 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-17 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-29 20:55 ` Olof Johansson
2015-03-29 20:55 ` Olof Johansson
2015-04-02 8:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-04-02 8:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150306170708.GR3989@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.