From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: default to CRC enabled filesystems
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:47:19 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150320214719.GJ28621@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550C3C39.8050400@sandeen.net>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:26:49AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/19/15 6:13 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:55:25AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >> Problem here is that if both are explicitly specified, one is ignored, rather
> >> than letting the user know they've selected an invalid set of options:
> >
> > Yup, I explicitly made that choice: turning off CRCs immediately
> > turns off all functionality dependent on it. Especially as the
> > number of errors being thrown by xfstests when run with
> > MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0".
> >
> >> # mkfs/mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=fsfile,size=1g -m crc=0,finobt=1
> >> meta-data=fsfile isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=65536 blks
> >> = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
> >> = crc=0 finobt=0
> >> ...
> >
> >> This might require a "finobtflag" to keep track of whether it's user-specified,
> >> as we do with other options?
> >
> > I *hate* the profusion of flags in mkfs just to detect this sort of
> > thing. This is a clear case where "do what I mean" rather than "do
> > what I say" is the prefered behaviour - the current code is a
> > horrible mess because it tries handle every weird combination of "do
> > what I say" with some error message.
> >
> > I'll change it to add the stupid error message back in and go and
> > write all the patches for xfstests not to fail because we changed
> > mkfs defaults...
>
> Oops, I accidentally missed reply-all last time.
>
> I just think that silently changing an explicitly-specified option seems
> like a bad idea.
>
> Perhaps if defaults are specified before getopt, the getopt handlers can
> flag the incorrect combination, and bail without the extra flag.
>
> I don't see how this requires xfstests rework, though?
About 50 tests fail with:
xfs/031 6s ... - output mismatch (see /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_v4/xfs/031.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/031.out 2014-01-20 16:57:33.000000000 +1100
+++ /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_v4/xfs/031.out.bad 2015-03-18 18:41:36.000000000 +1100
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
done
=== twenty entries (block form)
+warning: finobt not supported without CRC support, disabled.
Repairing, iteration 1
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using <TYPEOF> log
...
(Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/031.out /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs_v4/xfs/031.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
When run with MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0".
i.e. finobt is not specified, but mkfs issues warnings about it.
I've reworked the patch, anyway, so there's no need to continue the
discussion on this...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 23:22 [PATCH] mkfs: default to CRC enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2015-03-19 14:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-19 14:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-19 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-20 15:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-20 21:47 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-03-20 21:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-20 2:27 ` Linda Walsh
2015-03-20 2:44 ` Greg Freemyer
2015-03-20 18:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150320214719.GJ28621@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.