From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com,
paulus@samba.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Generic IOMMU pooled allocator
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 20:36:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201503222036.02669.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318.222517.1444725543017433108.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thursday 19 March 2015, David Miller wrote:
> PowerPC folks, we're trying to kill the locking contention in our
> IOMMU allocators and noticed that you guys have a nice solution to
> this in your IOMMU code.
>
> Sowmini put together a patch series that tries to extract out the
> generic parts of your code and place it in lib/iommu-common.c so
> that both Sparc and PowerPC can make use of it.
>
> The real test is if powerpc can be converted to use it.
>
> So if you guys could please take a look at the current version of
> this series at:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449712/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449713/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449715/
>
> and give us some feedback that would be great.
>
> After we sort out making this work properly for both architectures we
> can figure out who merges which parts via what tree(s)
How does this relate to the ARM implementation? There is currently
an effort going on to make that one shared with ARM64 and possibly
x86. Has anyone looked at both the PowerPC and ARM ways of doing the
allocation to see if we could pick one of the two to work on
all architectures?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com,
paulus@samba.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Generic IOMMU pooled allocator
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:36:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201503222036.02669.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150318.222517.1444725543017433108.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thursday 19 March 2015, David Miller wrote:
> PowerPC folks, we're trying to kill the locking contention in our
> IOMMU allocators and noticed that you guys have a nice solution to
> this in your IOMMU code.
>
> Sowmini put together a patch series that tries to extract out the
> generic parts of your code and place it in lib/iommu-common.c so
> that both Sparc and PowerPC can make use of it.
>
> The real test is if powerpc can be converted to use it.
>
> So if you guys could please take a look at the current version of
> this series at:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449712/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449713/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/449715/
>
> and give us some feedback that would be great.
>
> After we sort out making this work properly for both architectures we
> can figure out who merges which parts via what tree(s)
How does this relate to the ARM implementation? There is currently
an effort going on to make that one shared with ARM64 and possibly
x86. Has anyone looked at both the PowerPC and ARM ways of doing the
allocation to see if we could pick one of the two to work on
all architectures?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-22 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 2:25 Generic IOMMU pooled allocator David Miller
2015-03-19 2:25 ` David Miller
2015-03-19 2:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-19 2:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-19 2:50 ` David Miller
2015-03-19 2:50 ` David Miller
2015-03-19 3:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-19 3:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-19 5:27 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-03-19 5:27 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-03-19 13:34 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-19 13:34 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-22 19:27 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-22 19:27 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 16:29 ` David Miller
2015-03-23 16:29 ` David Miller
2015-03-23 16:54 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 16:54 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 19:05 ` David Miller
2015-03-23 19:05 ` David Miller
2015-03-23 19:09 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 19:09 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 23:08 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 23:08 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 23:29 ` chase rayfield
2015-03-24 0:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-24 0:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-24 1:11 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-24 1:11 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-24 1:44 ` David Miller
2015-03-24 1:44 ` David Miller
2015-03-24 1:57 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-24 1:57 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-24 2:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-24 2:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-24 2:15 ` David Miller
2015-03-24 2:15 ` David Miller
2015-03-26 0:43 ` cascardo
2015-03-26 0:43 ` cascardo
2015-03-26 0:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-26 0:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-26 10:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-26 10:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-26 22:51 ` David Miller
2015-03-26 23:00 ` David Miller
2015-03-26 23:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-26 23:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 22:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 22:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 23:19 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-23 23:19 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-24 0:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-24 0:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-22 19:36 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-03-22 19:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-22 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-22 22:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-22 22:07 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-22 22:07 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-03-22 22:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-22 22:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 6:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-23 6:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-23 11:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 11:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-03-23 18:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-23 18:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201503222036.02669.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.