From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou
<pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou
<panto-wVdstyuyKrO8r51toPun2/C9HSW9iNxf@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Empty node & property flag accessors when !OF
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150322210315.GA974@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320121223.16D69C4076B-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:12:23PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:13:51 -0600
> , Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
> > +Wolfram
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> > <pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Introduce empty node and property flag accessors when CONFIG_OF is not
> > > defined.
> > > This allows us to use them without ifdef'ing them in places where it
> > > makes sense to do so.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > I've asked Wolfram to apply. While not a fix itself, this is needed
> > for an I2C related fix for 3.19.
>
> I don't see this in mainline or linux-next, so I've applied to my tree.
> Thanks.
Thanks! I didn't have the original patch and asked for a resend. That
never happened, so it slipped through.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <panto@antoniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Empty node & property flag accessors when !OF
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 22:03:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150322210315.GA974@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150320121223.16D69C4076B@trevor.secretlab.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 927 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:12:23PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:13:51 -0600
> , Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > +Wolfram
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> > <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > Introduce empty node and property flag accessors when CONFIG_OF is not
> > > defined.
> > > This allows us to use them without ifdef'ing them in places where it
> > > makes sense to do so.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > I've asked Wolfram to apply. While not a fix itself, this is needed
> > for an I2C related fix for 3.19.
>
> I don't see this in mainline or linux-next, so I've applied to my tree.
> Thanks.
Thanks! I didn't have the original patch and asked for a resend. That
never happened, so it slipped through.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-22 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-21 17:05 [PATCH] of: Empty node & property flag accessors when !OF Pantelis Antoniou
2015-01-21 17:05 ` Pantelis Antoniou
[not found] ` <1421859957-24457-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 23:13 ` Rob Herring
2015-01-22 23:13 ` Rob Herring
2015-03-20 12:12 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20150320121223.16D69C4076B-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-22 21:03 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-03-22 21:03 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150322210315.GA974@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=panto-wVdstyuyKrO8r51toPun2/C9HSW9iNxf@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.