From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/5] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:55:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323133048.GA27897@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5enKYeq8id8s+w+AA1e0haZci9ZEXj+3VSPdm_=Uy7vbHOFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 01:25:37PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On 23 March 2015 at 13:21, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sigh. Checking the emails I actually sent, I seem to *somehow* have
> > sent old files in this resend :S I really don't know how this
> > happened. My copies of the patches all apply perfectly correctly, but
> > these are not the ones I sent.
>
> And just to add to my embarrassment, this is actually *not* the case,
> they DO all apply, gmail mangled the patches. So they seem fine after
> all!
>
> Sudip - could you try to carefully grab each of the 5 patches with
> [RESEND 2] in the subject to make sure you are applying them
> correctly?
my apologies. they are applying properly. i had them already applied
for testing that hardware change, and again i tried to apply them.
sorry for the confusion. :(
regards
sudip
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Lorenzo Stoakes
> https:/ljs.io
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/5] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 19:13:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323133048.GA27897@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5enKYeq8id8s+w+AA1e0haZci9ZEXj+3VSPdm_=Uy7vbHOFQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 01:25:37PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On 23 March 2015 at 13:21, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sigh. Checking the emails I actually sent, I seem to *somehow* have
> > sent old files in this resend :S I really don't know how this
> > happened. My copies of the patches all apply perfectly correctly, but
> > these are not the ones I sent.
>
> And just to add to my embarrassment, this is actually *not* the case,
> they DO all apply, gmail mangled the patches. So they seem fine after
> all!
>
> Sudip - could you try to carefully grab each of the 5 patches with
> [RESEND 2] in the subject to make sure you are applying them
> correctly?
my apologies. they are applying properly. i had them already applied
for testing that hardware change, and again i tried to apply them.
sorry for the confusion. :(
regards
sudip
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Lorenzo Stoakes
> https:/ljs.io
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-20 15:22 [PATCH RESEND 2 1/5] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 2/5] staging: sm750fb: Make internal functions static Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 3/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove unused function Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 4/5] staging: sm750fb: Fix __iomem pointer types Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 5/5] staging: sm750fb: Remove spinlock helper function Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-20 15:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 10:53 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 1/5] staging: sm750fb: Use memset_io instead of memset Dan Carpenter
2015-03-23 10:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-23 11:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 11:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-23 11:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-23 12:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 12:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 12:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 13:02 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 13:14 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 13:26 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 13:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 13:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 13:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-23 13:43 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-03-23 13:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 13:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-23 13:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323133048.GA27897@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.