All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"grygorii.strashko@linaro.org" <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402215301.GA24500@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 02 2015 at 15:12 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>>> > -                     unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>>> > force,
>>>>> > -                     enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                unsigned long private, struct page
>>>>> > *page,
>>>>> > +                                int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> >  {
>>>>> >       int rc = 0;
>>>>> >       int *result = NULL;
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>>> mechanism?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>>
>>>> How does this look?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin, could you please retest?  I might have fat-fingered something...
>>>
>>>
>>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>>
>>> /me goes to test a few more compilers...   OK...
>>>
>>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>>
>>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>>
>>
>> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>>
>
>Thanks for checking.  I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
>that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.

Yes, thank you. This fixes it on 4.7.4
>
>Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:53:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402215301.GA24500@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 02 2015 at 15:12 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>>> > -                     unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>>> > force,
>>>>> > -                     enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                unsigned long private, struct page
>>>>> > *page,
>>>>> > +                                int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> >  {
>>>>> >       int rc = 0;
>>>>> >       int *result = NULL;
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>>> mechanism?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>>
>>>> How does this look?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin, could you please retest?  I might have fat-fingered something...
>>>
>>>
>>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>>
>>> /me goes to test a few more compilers...   OK...
>>>
>>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>>
>>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>>
>>
>> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>>
>
>Thanks for checking.  I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
>that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.

Yes, thank you. This fixes it on 4.7.4
>
>Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lina.iyer@linaro.org (Lina Iyer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402215301.GA24500@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 02 2015 at 15:12 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>>> > -                     unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>>> > force,
>>>>> > -                     enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                unsigned long private, struct page
>>>>> > *page,
>>>>> > +                                int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> >  {
>>>>> >       int rc = 0;
>>>>> >       int *result = NULL;
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>>> mechanism?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>>
>>>> How does this look?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin, could you please retest?  I might have fat-fingered something...
>>>
>>>
>>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>>
>>> /me goes to test a few more compilers...   OK...
>>>
>>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>>
>>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>>
>>
>> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>>
>
>Thanks for checking.  I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
>that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.

Yes, thank you. This fixes it on 4.7.4
>
>Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"grygorii.strashko@linaro.org" <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:53:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402215301.GA24500@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 02 2015 at 15:12 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>>> > -                     unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>>> > force,
>>>>> > -                     enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>>> > +                                unsigned long private, struct page
>>>>> > *page,
>>>>> > +                                int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>>> >  {
>>>>> >       int rc = 0;
>>>>> >       int *result = NULL;
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>>> mechanism?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>>
>>>> How does this look?
>>>>
>>>> Kevin, could you please retest?  I might have fat-fingered something...
>>>
>>>
>>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>>
>>> /me goes to test a few more compilers...   OK...
>>>
>>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>>
>>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>>
>>
>> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>>
>
>Thanks for checking.  I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
>that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.

Yes, thank you. This fixes it on 4.7.4
>
>Kevin

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-02 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24  0:45 Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-24  0:45 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-24  0:52 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  0:52   ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  0:53   ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  0:53     ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24  8:31   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:13   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-24 16:13     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-24 16:13     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-24 18:42     ` [PATCH] gpio: syscon: reduce message level when direction reg offset not in dt grygorii.strashko
2015-03-24 20:00       ` Murali Karicheri
2015-03-24 20:00         ` Murali Karicheri
2015-03-24 20:52       ` santosh shilimkar
2015-03-27 10:18       ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-26  0:39     ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-26  0:39       ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26  0:39       ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26 13:36       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 13:36         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 13:36         ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:29         ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-26 15:29           ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-26 15:29           ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27  0:25           ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27  0:25             ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27  0:25             ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 10:06             ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 10:06               ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 10:06               ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 11:55               ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 11:55                 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 11:55                 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 15:18               ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27 15:18                 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27 15:18                 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-31 18:58               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-31 18:58                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-31 21:39                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 21:39                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 21:39                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 22:10                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-31 22:10                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-31 22:10                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  9:37                     ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible regression in gcc 4.7.3 next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page") Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:37                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:37                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:37                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:37                       ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible re Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:47                       ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01  9:47                         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01  9:47                         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01  9:47                         ` Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01 19:40                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 19:40                           ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 19:40                           ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 19:40                           ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 21:54                           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:54                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:54                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:54                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:54                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:59                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-01 21:59                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-01 21:59                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-01 21:59                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02  7:17                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02  7:17                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02  7:17                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02  7:17                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 19:12                             ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 19:12                               ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 19:12                               ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 19:12                               ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:12                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:12                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:12                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:12                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:53                                 ` Lina Iyer [this message]
2015-04-02 21:53                                   ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:53                                   ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:53                                   ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-07 17:57                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 17:57                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 17:57                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 17:57                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 20:17                               ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 20:17                                 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 20:17                                 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 20:17                                 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:41                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:41                                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:41                                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:41                                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:53                                   ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:53                                     ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:53                                     ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:53                                     ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:27                                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:27                                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:27                                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:27                                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:36                                       ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:36                                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:36                                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:36                                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-08  0:15                                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-08  0:15                                           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-08  0:15                                           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-08  0:15                                           ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  8:58                 ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Will Deacon
2015-04-01  8:58                   ` Will Deacon
2015-04-01  8:58                   ` Will Deacon
2015-04-01 13:54                   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 13:54                     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 13:54                     ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 18:12                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 18:12                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 18:12                     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150402215301.GA24500@linaro.org \
    --to=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@linaro.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=tyler.baker@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.