From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: vinod.koul@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
grant.likely@linaro.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, nm@ti.com, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:42:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150408154251.GE26727@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428498892-28471-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9889 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:14:45PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> DMA routers are transparent devices used to mux DMA requests from
> peripherals to DMA controllers. They are used when the SoC integrates more
> devices with DMA requests then their controller can handle.
> DRA7x is one example of such SoC, where the sDMA can hanlde 128 DMA request
> lines, but in SoC level it has 205 DMA requests.
>
> The of_dma_router will be registered as of_dma_controller with special
> xlate function and additional parameters. The driver for the router is
> responsible to craft the dma_spec (in the of_dma_route_allocate callback)
> which can be used to requests a DMA channel from the real DMA controller.
> This way the router can be transparent for the system while remaining generic
> enough to be used in different environments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt | 28 +++++++++
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 7 +++
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 17 ++++++
> include/linux/of_dma.h | 21 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 159 insertions(+)
Can that be moved to a header / C file of its own?
There's a lot of various code already in dmaengine.h and dmaengine.c,
it would be really great to avoid adding more random stuff in there.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> index 82104271e754..6312fb00ce8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> @@ -31,6 +31,34 @@ Example:
> dma-requests = <127>;
> };
>
> +* DMA router
> +
> +DMA routers are transparent IP blocks used to route DMA request lines from
> +devices to the DMA controller. Some SoCs (like TI DRA7x) have more peripherals
> +integrated with DMA requests than what the DMA controller can handle directly.
> +
> +Required property:
> +- dma-masters: phandle of the DMA controller or list of phandles for
> + the DMA controllers the router can direct the signal to.
> +- #dma-cells: Must be at least 1. Used to provide DMA router specific
> + information. See DMA client binding below for more
> + details.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- dma-requests: Number of incoming request lines the router can handle.
> +- In the node pointed by the dma-masters:
> + - dma-requests: The router driver might need to look for this in order
> + to configure the routing.
> +
> +Example:
> + sdma_xbar: dma-router@4a002b78 {
> + compatible = "ti,dra7-dma-crossbar";
> + reg = <0x4a002b78 0xfc>;
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + dma-requests = <205>;
> + ti,dma-safe-map = <0>;
> + dma-masters = <&sdma>;
> + };
>
> * DMA client
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 24967c89f5d4..c7aa232b4a59 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -267,6 +267,13 @@ static void dma_chan_put(struct dma_chan *chan)
> /* This channel is not in use anymore, free it */
> if (!chan->client_count && chan->device->device_free_chan_resources)
> chan->device->device_free_chan_resources(chan);
> +
> + /* If the channel is used via a DMA request router, free the mapping */
> + if (chan->router && chan->router->route_free) {
> + chan->router->route_free(chan->router->dev, chan->route_data);
> + chan->router = NULL;
> + chan->route_data = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> enum dma_status dma_sync_wait(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_cookie_t cookie)
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> index cbd4a8aff120..98b3b61624f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,47 @@ static struct of_dma *of_dma_find_controller(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec)
> }
>
> /**
> + * of_dma_router_xlate - translation function for router devices
> + * @dma_spec: pointer to DMA specifier as found in the device tree
> + * @of_dma: pointer to DMA controller data (router information)
> + *
> + * The function creates new dma_spec to be passed to the router driver's
> + * of_dma_route_allocate() function to prepare a dma_spec which will be used
> + * to request channel from the real DMA controller.
> + */
> +static struct dma_chan *of_dma_router_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> + struct of_dma *ofdma)
> +{
> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> + struct of_dma *ofdma_target;
> + struct of_phandle_args dma_spec_target;
> + void *route_data;
> +
> + /* translate the request for the real DMA controller */
> + memcpy(&dma_spec_target, dma_spec, sizeof(dma_spec_target));
> + route_data = ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate(&dma_spec_target, ofdma);
> +
> + ofdma_target = of_dma_find_controller(&dma_spec_target);
> + if (!ofdma_target)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + chan = ofdma_target->of_dma_xlate(&dma_spec_target, ofdma_target);
> + if (chan) {
> + chan->router = ofdma->dma_router;
> + chan->route_data = route_data;
> + } else {
> + ofdma->dma_router->route_free(ofdma->dma_router->dev, route_data);
This line is over 80 characters.
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to put the node back since the ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate
> + * has taken it for generating the new, translated dma_spec
> + */
> + of_node_put(dma_spec_target.np);
> + return chan;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * of_dma_controller_register - Register a DMA controller to DT DMA helpers
> * @np: device node of DMA controller
> * @of_dma_xlate: translation function which converts a phandle
> @@ -110,6 +151,51 @@ void of_dma_controller_free(struct device_node *np)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_controller_free);
>
> /**
> + * of_dma_router_register - Register a DMA router to DT DMA helpers as a
> + * controller
> + * @np: device node of DMA router
> + * @of_dma_route_allocate: setup function for the router which need to
> + * modify the dma_spec for the DMA controller to
> + * use and to set up the requested route.
> + * @dma_router: pointer to dma_router structure to be used when
> + * the route need to be free up.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or appropriate errno value on error.
> + *
> + * Allocated memory should be freed with appropriate of_dma_controller_free()
> + * call.
> + */
> +int of_dma_router_register(struct device_node *np,
> + void *(*of_dma_route_allocate)
> + (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *),
> + struct dma_router *dma_router)
> +{
> + struct of_dma *ofdma;
> +
> + if (!np || !of_dma_route_allocate || !dma_router) {
> + pr_err("%s: not enough information provided\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ofdma = kzalloc(sizeof(*ofdma), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ofdma)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Is that expected that you allocate through kzalloc, but never have a
matching free function implemented?
> + ofdma->of_node = np;
> + ofdma->of_dma_xlate = of_dma_router_xlate;
> + ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate = of_dma_route_allocate;
> + ofdma->dma_router = dma_router;
> +
> + /* Now queue of_dma controller structure in list */
> + mutex_lock(&of_dma_lock);
> + list_add_tail(&ofdma->of_dma_controllers, &of_dma_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&of_dma_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_router_register);
> +
> +/**
> * of_dma_match_channel - Check if a DMA specifier matches name
> * @np: device node to look for DMA channels
> * @name: channel name to be matched
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index ad419757241f..abf63ceabef9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,16 @@ struct dma_chan_percpu {
> };
>
> /**
> + * struct dma_router - DMA router structure
> + * @dev: pointer to the DMA router device
> + * @route_free: function to be called when the route can be disconnected
> + */
> +struct dma_router {
> + struct device *dev;
> + void (*route_free)(struct device *dev, void *route_data);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> * struct dma_chan - devices supply DMA channels, clients use them
> * @device: ptr to the dma device who supplies this channel, always !%NULL
> * @cookie: last cookie value returned to client
> @@ -232,6 +242,8 @@ struct dma_chan_percpu {
> * @local: per-cpu pointer to a struct dma_chan_percpu
> * @client_count: how many clients are using this channel
> * @table_count: number of appearances in the mem-to-mem allocation table
> + * @router: pointer to the DMA router structure
> + * @route_data: channel specific data for the router
> * @private: private data for certain client-channel associations
> */
> struct dma_chan {
> @@ -247,6 +259,11 @@ struct dma_chan {
> struct dma_chan_percpu __percpu *local;
> int client_count;
> int table_count;
> +
> + /* DMA router */
> + struct dma_router *router;
> + void *route_data;
> +
> void *private;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_dma.h b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> index 56bc026c143f..734e449f87c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ struct of_dma {
> struct device_node *of_node;
> struct dma_chan *(*of_dma_xlate)
> (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
> + void *(*of_dma_route_allocate)
> + (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
> + struct dma_router *dma_router;
I don't really see why this is really tied to the device tree.
Couldn't we use the device_alloc_chan_resources to do that?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:42:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150408154251.GE26727@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428498892-28471-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:14:45PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> DMA routers are transparent devices used to mux DMA requests from
> peripherals to DMA controllers. They are used when the SoC integrates more
> devices with DMA requests then their controller can handle.
> DRA7x is one example of such SoC, where the sDMA can hanlde 128 DMA request
> lines, but in SoC level it has 205 DMA requests.
>
> The of_dma_router will be registered as of_dma_controller with special
> xlate function and additional parameters. The driver for the router is
> responsible to craft the dma_spec (in the of_dma_route_allocate callback)
> which can be used to requests a DMA channel from the real DMA controller.
> This way the router can be transparent for the system while remaining generic
> enough to be used in different environments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt | 28 +++++++++
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 7 +++
> drivers/dma/of-dma.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 17 ++++++
> include/linux/of_dma.h | 21 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 159 insertions(+)
Can that be moved to a header / C file of its own?
There's a lot of various code already in dmaengine.h and dmaengine.c,
it would be really great to avoid adding more random stuff in there.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> index 82104271e754..6312fb00ce8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt
> @@ -31,6 +31,34 @@ Example:
> dma-requests = <127>;
> };
>
> +* DMA router
> +
> +DMA routers are transparent IP blocks used to route DMA request lines from
> +devices to the DMA controller. Some SoCs (like TI DRA7x) have more peripherals
> +integrated with DMA requests than what the DMA controller can handle directly.
> +
> +Required property:
> +- dma-masters: phandle of the DMA controller or list of phandles for
> + the DMA controllers the router can direct the signal to.
> +- #dma-cells: Must be at least 1. Used to provide DMA router specific
> + information. See DMA client binding below for more
> + details.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- dma-requests: Number of incoming request lines the router can handle.
> +- In the node pointed by the dma-masters:
> + - dma-requests: The router driver might need to look for this in order
> + to configure the routing.
> +
> +Example:
> + sdma_xbar: dma-router at 4a002b78 {
> + compatible = "ti,dra7-dma-crossbar";
> + reg = <0x4a002b78 0xfc>;
> + #dma-cells = <1>;
> + dma-requests = <205>;
> + ti,dma-safe-map = <0>;
> + dma-masters = <&sdma>;
> + };
>
> * DMA client
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 24967c89f5d4..c7aa232b4a59 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -267,6 +267,13 @@ static void dma_chan_put(struct dma_chan *chan)
> /* This channel is not in use anymore, free it */
> if (!chan->client_count && chan->device->device_free_chan_resources)
> chan->device->device_free_chan_resources(chan);
> +
> + /* If the channel is used via a DMA request router, free the mapping */
> + if (chan->router && chan->router->route_free) {
> + chan->router->route_free(chan->router->dev, chan->route_data);
> + chan->router = NULL;
> + chan->route_data = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> enum dma_status dma_sync_wait(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_cookie_t cookie)
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> index cbd4a8aff120..98b3b61624f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/of-dma.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,47 @@ static struct of_dma *of_dma_find_controller(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec)
> }
>
> /**
> + * of_dma_router_xlate - translation function for router devices
> + * @dma_spec: pointer to DMA specifier as found in the device tree
> + * @of_dma: pointer to DMA controller data (router information)
> + *
> + * The function creates new dma_spec to be passed to the router driver's
> + * of_dma_route_allocate() function to prepare a dma_spec which will be used
> + * to request channel from the real DMA controller.
> + */
> +static struct dma_chan *of_dma_router_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> + struct of_dma *ofdma)
> +{
> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> + struct of_dma *ofdma_target;
> + struct of_phandle_args dma_spec_target;
> + void *route_data;
> +
> + /* translate the request for the real DMA controller */
> + memcpy(&dma_spec_target, dma_spec, sizeof(dma_spec_target));
> + route_data = ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate(&dma_spec_target, ofdma);
> +
> + ofdma_target = of_dma_find_controller(&dma_spec_target);
> + if (!ofdma_target)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + chan = ofdma_target->of_dma_xlate(&dma_spec_target, ofdma_target);
> + if (chan) {
> + chan->router = ofdma->dma_router;
> + chan->route_data = route_data;
> + } else {
> + ofdma->dma_router->route_free(ofdma->dma_router->dev, route_data);
This line is over 80 characters.
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to put the node back since the ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate
> + * has taken it for generating the new, translated dma_spec
> + */
> + of_node_put(dma_spec_target.np);
> + return chan;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * of_dma_controller_register - Register a DMA controller to DT DMA helpers
> * @np: device node of DMA controller
> * @of_dma_xlate: translation function which converts a phandle
> @@ -110,6 +151,51 @@ void of_dma_controller_free(struct device_node *np)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_controller_free);
>
> /**
> + * of_dma_router_register - Register a DMA router to DT DMA helpers as a
> + * controller
> + * @np: device node of DMA router
> + * @of_dma_route_allocate: setup function for the router which need to
> + * modify the dma_spec for the DMA controller to
> + * use and to set up the requested route.
> + * @dma_router: pointer to dma_router structure to be used when
> + * the route need to be free up.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or appropriate errno value on error.
> + *
> + * Allocated memory should be freed with appropriate of_dma_controller_free()
> + * call.
> + */
> +int of_dma_router_register(struct device_node *np,
> + void *(*of_dma_route_allocate)
> + (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *),
> + struct dma_router *dma_router)
> +{
> + struct of_dma *ofdma;
> +
> + if (!np || !of_dma_route_allocate || !dma_router) {
> + pr_err("%s: not enough information provided\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ofdma = kzalloc(sizeof(*ofdma), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ofdma)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Is that expected that you allocate through kzalloc, but never have a
matching free function implemented?
> + ofdma->of_node = np;
> + ofdma->of_dma_xlate = of_dma_router_xlate;
> + ofdma->of_dma_route_allocate = of_dma_route_allocate;
> + ofdma->dma_router = dma_router;
> +
> + /* Now queue of_dma controller structure in list */
> + mutex_lock(&of_dma_lock);
> + list_add_tail(&ofdma->of_dma_controllers, &of_dma_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&of_dma_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_router_register);
> +
> +/**
> * of_dma_match_channel - Check if a DMA specifier matches name
> * @np: device node to look for DMA channels
> * @name: channel name to be matched
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> index ad419757241f..abf63ceabef9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,16 @@ struct dma_chan_percpu {
> };
>
> /**
> + * struct dma_router - DMA router structure
> + * @dev: pointer to the DMA router device
> + * @route_free: function to be called when the route can be disconnected
> + */
> +struct dma_router {
> + struct device *dev;
> + void (*route_free)(struct device *dev, void *route_data);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> * struct dma_chan - devices supply DMA channels, clients use them
> * @device: ptr to the dma device who supplies this channel, always !%NULL
> * @cookie: last cookie value returned to client
> @@ -232,6 +242,8 @@ struct dma_chan_percpu {
> * @local: per-cpu pointer to a struct dma_chan_percpu
> * @client_count: how many clients are using this channel
> * @table_count: number of appearances in the mem-to-mem allocation table
> + * @router: pointer to the DMA router structure
> + * @route_data: channel specific data for the router
> * @private: private data for certain client-channel associations
> */
> struct dma_chan {
> @@ -247,6 +259,11 @@ struct dma_chan {
> struct dma_chan_percpu __percpu *local;
> int client_count;
> int table_count;
> +
> + /* DMA router */
> + struct dma_router *router;
> + void *route_data;
> +
> void *private;
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_dma.h b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> index 56bc026c143f..734e449f87c1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_dma.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ struct of_dma {
> struct device_node *of_node;
> struct dma_chan *(*of_dma_xlate)
> (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
> + void *(*of_dma_route_allocate)
> + (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
> + struct dma_router *dma_router;
I don't really see why this is really tied to the device tree.
Couldn't we use the device_alloc_chan_resources to do that?
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150408/9b73cb30/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-08 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 13:14 [PATCH v4 0/8] dmaengine/dra7x: DMA router (crossbar support) Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] dmaengine: of_dma: Support for DMA routers Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 15:42 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-04-08 15:42 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-09 8:24 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-09 8:24 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-09 8:24 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-10 7:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-10 7:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-15 8:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-15 8:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-15 8:36 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: devicetree: dma: Binding documentation for TI DMA crossbar Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] dmaengine: Add driver for TI DMA crossbar on DRA7x Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 15:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-08 15:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-04-09 8:09 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-09 8:09 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-09 8:09 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] dmaengine: omap-dma: Use defines for dma channels and request count Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] dmaengine: omap-dma: Take DMA request number from DT if it is available Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] dmaengine: omap-dma: Remove mapping between virtual channels and requests Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] dmaengine: omap-dma: Reduce the number of virtual channels Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] ARM: DTS: dra7x: Integrate sDMA crossbar Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2015-04-08 13:14 ` Peter Ujfalusi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150408154251.GE26727@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.