All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakub Kiciński" <moorray3@wp.pl>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: rob.herring@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Dave.Martin@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_probe()
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:16:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150412121622.2ee92f59@north> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428578961-6896-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>

On Thu,  9 Apr 2015 12:29:16 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently the pl011_probe() function is relying on some AMBA IDs
> and a device tree node to initialize the driver and a port.
> Both features are not necessarily required for the driver:
> - we lack AMBA IDs in the ARM SBSA generic UART and
> - we lack a DT node in ACPI systems.
> So lets refactor the function to ease later reuse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c |   89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index e1ac2cb..65df5c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -2174,13 +2174,10 @@ static void pl011_unregister_port(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
>  		uart_unregister_driver(&amba_reg);
>  }
>  
> -
> -static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
> +static int pl011_allocate_port(struct device *dev, struct uart_amba_port **_uap)
>  {
>  	struct uart_amba_port *uap;
> -	struct vendor_data *vendor = id->data;
> -	void __iomem *base;
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports); i++)
>  		if (amba_ports[i] == NULL)
> @@ -2189,51 +2186,53 @@ static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
>  	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	uap = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(struct uart_amba_port),
> -			   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	uap = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct uart_amba_port), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (uap == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	i = pl011_probe_dt_alias(i, &dev->dev);
> +	if (_uap)
> +		*_uap = uap;
> +
> +	return i;
> +}

Could we please move the allocation out of this function and spare
ourselves the "out argument".  It's just a matter of personal
preference so the final decision is up to you.

Also you never pass _uap as NULL so the check is unnecessary.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: moorray3@wp.pl (Jakub Kiciński)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_probe()
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:16:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150412121622.2ee92f59@north> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428578961-6896-6-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>

On Thu,  9 Apr 2015 12:29:16 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently the pl011_probe() function is relying on some AMBA IDs
> and a device tree node to initialize the driver and a port.
> Both features are not necessarily required for the driver:
> - we lack AMBA IDs in the ARM SBSA generic UART and
> - we lack a DT node in ACPI systems.
> So lets refactor the function to ease later reuse.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c |   89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> index e1ac2cb..65df5c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -2174,13 +2174,10 @@ static void pl011_unregister_port(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
>  		uart_unregister_driver(&amba_reg);
>  }
>  
> -
> -static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
> +static int pl011_allocate_port(struct device *dev, struct uart_amba_port **_uap)
>  {
>  	struct uart_amba_port *uap;
> -	struct vendor_data *vendor = id->data;
> -	void __iomem *base;
> -	int i, ret;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports); i++)
>  		if (amba_ports[i] == NULL)
> @@ -2189,51 +2186,53 @@ static int pl011_probe(struct amba_device *dev, const struct amba_id *id)
>  	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(amba_ports))
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  
> -	uap = devm_kzalloc(&dev->dev, sizeof(struct uart_amba_port),
> -			   GFP_KERNEL);
> +	uap = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct uart_amba_port), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (uap == NULL)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	i = pl011_probe_dt_alias(i, &dev->dev);
> +	if (_uap)
> +		*_uap = uap;
> +
> +	return i;
> +}

Could we please move the allocation out of this function and spare
ourselves the "out argument".  It's just a matter of personal
preference so the final decision is up to you.

Also you never pass _uap as NULL so the check is unnecessary.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-12 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-09 11:29 [PATCH v3 00/10] drivers: PL011: add ARM SBSA Generic UART support Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drivers: PL011: avoid potential unregister_driver call Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-12  9:15   ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-04-12  9:15     ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_startup() Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_shutdown() Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-12  9:19   ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-04-12  9:19     ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_set_termios() Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drivers: PL011: refactor pl011_probe() Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-12 10:16   ` Jakub Kiciński [this message]
2015-04-12 10:16     ` Jakub Kiciński
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drivers: PL011: replace UART_MIS reading with _RIS & _IMSC Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drivers: PL011: move cts_event workaround into separate function Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drivers: PL011: allow avoiding UART enabling/disabling Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drivers: PL011: allow to supply fixed option string Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drivers: PL011: add support for the ARM SBSA generic UART Andre Przywara
2015-04-09 11:29   ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150412121622.2ee92f59@north \
    --to=moorray3@wp.pl \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.