Two new breakages since Thursday

[arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)]

On Monday 13 April 2015, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 10:00 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > And almost a week later, and most of these are still present.
> > 
> > Given that the merge window is potentially opening on Sunday, this
> > is very poor, because it means that we've had a week of failing
> > builds in the week before the merge window - the week where we
> > should be stabilising the code and getting it ready for submission
> > to Linus.
> > 
> > Right now, arm-soc is NOT ready for submission to Linus.
> > 
> > Please fix this as a top priority.
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 09:06:45AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Two new breakages have appeared since Thursday.  The first affects both
> > > ARM and ARM64 builds (a missing file), the second only ARM builds.
> > > 
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135-pinfunc.h:18:40: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h: No such file or directory
> > > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S:143: Error: selected processor does not support ARM mode `dsb'
> 
> Hi Arnd/Olof,
> 
> The mediatek part is due to merge dependency in pinctrl driver. It is
> discussed in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-April/336258.html
> 
> I thought we already decided to revert DT node in arm-soc tree for 4.1.
> What should we do next?

I've finally managed to find my way through the email backlog from being
away for three weeks and got to this one now. Patch is reverted in next/dt now.

Sorry about the delay in processing this.

	Arnd