Two new breakages since Thursday

[tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)]

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [150414 08:00]:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2015 07:28:47 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > I managed to catch up with my email last night and pulled in these two fixes
> > > as well as a number of others that we had neglected over the last two weeks.
> > > 
> > > I found one new regression with the overnight build tests in a branch I pulled
> > > in as 'next/late' from Tony, and backed that out now. I'll wait for you and
> > > Stephen Rothwell (who also reported these issues) to confirm that it's ok
> > > now and we'll hopefully be ready to send pull requests by the end of the
> > > week.
> > 
> > Hmm what's this issue you're mentioning here for the next/late? Is it the
> > merge conflict with camera related changes fixed up by Stephen Rothwell
> > in next?
> > 
> > 
> 
> This is the error I get during 'make dtbs':
> 
>   DTC     arch/arm/boot/dts/am3517_mt_ventoux.dtb
> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "omap3_scm_general"
> 
> The problem is evidently commit b8845074cfbbd ("ARM: dts: omap3: add
> minimal l4 bus layout with control module support"), which for some reason
> removes the tisyscon at 48002270 node that is still referenced through
> the &omap3_scm_general label from omap34xx.dtsi and omap36xx.dtsi.

I believe this issue got introduced on the 7th by the camera patches
I acked earlier. Stephen has been carrying this fix in next:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/6/436

The problem was we had two different SCM dts entries.. So with Tero's
changes we've now standardized on scm_conf.

Reagrds,

Tony