From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:06:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421070653.GA900@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150421072551.326bb4b7-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1403 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 07:25:51AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> > > single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> > > is no SMBus fallback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I've been missing such a tool a number of times now, so I finally got around to
> > > writing it myself. As with all I2C tools, it can be dangerous, but it can also
> > > be very useful when developing. I am not sure if distros should supply it, I'll
> > > leave that to Jean's experience. For embedded build systems, I think this
> > > should be selectable. It is RFC for now because it needs broader testing and some
> > > more beautification. However, I've been using it already to test the i2c_quirk
> > > infrastructure and Renesas I2C controllers.
> >
> > Jean, my tests went well and so I want to brush it up for inclusion into
> > i2c-tools upstream. Any show-stoppers you see from a high-level point of
> > view?
>
> I think it is a good idea, just I couldn't find the time to review it,
> sorry :(
No problem, no hurry. Glad to know that you like it in general.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:06:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421070653.GA900@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150421072551.326bb4b7-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1377 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 07:25:51AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> > > single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> > > is no SMBus fallback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I've been missing such a tool a number of times now, so I finally got around to
> > > writing it myself. As with all I2C tools, it can be dangerous, but it can also
> > > be very useful when developing. I am not sure if distros should supply it, I'll
> > > leave that to Jean's experience. For embedded build systems, I think this
> > > should be selectable. It is RFC for now because it needs broader testing and some
> > > more beautification. However, I've been using it already to test the i2c_quirk
> > > infrastructure and Renesas I2C controllers.
> >
> > Jean, my tests went well and so I want to brush it up for inclusion into
> > i2c-tools upstream. Any show-stoppers you see from a high-level point of
> > view?
>
> I think it is a good idea, just I couldn't find the time to review it,
> sorry :(
No problem, no hurry. Glad to know that you like it in general.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:06:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150421070653.GA900@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150421072551.326bb4b7@endymion.delvare>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1377 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 07:25:51AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:36:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:16:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> > > single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> > > is no SMBus fallback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I've been missing such a tool a number of times now, so I finally got around to
> > > writing it myself. As with all I2C tools, it can be dangerous, but it can also
> > > be very useful when developing. I am not sure if distros should supply it, I'll
> > > leave that to Jean's experience. For embedded build systems, I think this
> > > should be selectable. It is RFC for now because it needs broader testing and some
> > > more beautification. However, I've been using it already to test the i2c_quirk
> > > infrastructure and Renesas I2C controllers.
> >
> > Jean, my tests went well and so I want to brush it up for inclusion into
> > i2c-tools upstream. Any show-stoppers you see from a high-level point of
> > view?
>
> I think it is a good idea, just I couldn't find the time to review it,
> sorry :(
No problem, no hurry. Glad to know that you like it in general.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-21 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 16:16 [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool Wolfram Sang
2015-02-27 16:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-27 16:16 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1425053816-19804-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-20 17:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-20 17:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-20 17:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-21 5:25 ` Jean Delvare
2015-04-21 5:25 ` Jean Delvare
2015-04-21 5:25 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20150421072551.326bb4b7-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-21 7:06 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-04-21 7:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-04-21 7:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-07 20:08 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-07 20:08 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 8:54 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 8:54 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 14:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-08 14:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-08 21:40 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 21:40 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 21:40 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-09 6:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-09 6:50 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150508105401.223a8598-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-08 15:28 ` Randy Grunwell
2015-05-08 15:28 ` Randy Grunwell
2015-05-08 15:28 ` Randy Grunwell
2015-05-08 18:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-08 18:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-05-08 20:58 ` Jean Delvare
2015-05-08 20:58 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20150507220812.3776bb83-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-09 7:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-09 7:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-09 7:09 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150421070653.GA900@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.