From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: "Fabio Estevam" <Fabio.Estevam@freescale.com>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <sha@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: mxc_nand: limit the size of used oob
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 10:55:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150503075549.GH2265@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5AAcRu3gscLSQTiRExeS_pXO-uJm0uA3fL5uwYUUMMsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > That's surprising. It would be interesting to hear from Freescale what
> > is wrong here (Fabio? Maybe contact support?). I quickly skimmed through
> > the errata documents but didn't found anything. So it's not only that
>
> Yes, that's something I am not aware of either.
>
> Please contact the FSL support folks so that the hardware guys could
> assist on this topic.
Our past experience with hardware support at the micro level was not all that
great. Anyway, I dropped the limit to 128 for oobsize < 218, since this is
only a theoretic bug, and I can't really test it.
Thanks,
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: baruch@tkos.co.il (Baruch Siach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: mxc_nand: limit the size of used oob
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 10:55:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150503075549.GH2265@tarshish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5AAcRu3gscLSQTiRExeS_pXO-uJm0uA3fL5uwYUUMMsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > That's surprising. It would be interesting to hear from Freescale what
> > is wrong here (Fabio? Maybe contact support?). I quickly skimmed through
> > the errata documents but didn't found anything. So it's not only that
>
> Yes, that's something I am not aware of either.
>
> Please contact the FSL support folks so that the hardware guys could
> assist on this topic.
Our past experience with hardware support at the micro level was not all that
great. Anyway, I dropped the limit to 128 for oobsize < 218, since this is
only a theoretic bug, and I can't really test it.
Thanks,
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-03 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-26 8:16 [PATCH 0/4] mtd: mxc_nand: fix 8 bit ECC and large oob Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: cleanup copy_spare function Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: mxc_nand: limit the size of used oob Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 20:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-26 20:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 4:39 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 4:39 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 7:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 7:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 7:20 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 7:20 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 7:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 7:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 11:43 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 11:43 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 19:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 19:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-29 6:18 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-29 6:18 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-29 6:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-29 6:35 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-30 15:20 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-04-30 15:20 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-05-03 7:55 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2015-05-03 7:55 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] mtd: mxc_nand: fix truncate of unaligned oob copying Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 19:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-26 19:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 4:46 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 4:46 ` Baruch Siach
2015-04-27 6:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-27 6:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-04-26 8:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: mxc_nand: generate nand_ecclayout for 8 bit ECC Baruch Siach
2015-04-26 8:16 ` Baruch Siach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150503075549.GH2265@tarshish \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=Fabio.Estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sha@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.