From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: Dominick Grift <dac.override@gmail.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suspicious RCU usage in bridge with Linux v4.0-9362-g1fc149933fd4
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 13:27:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504132714.55dca5b0@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7PAzzz+CZfnOoweBdeLY8tRkr2bSDEpQgdtEKUeaZbWpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 4 May 2015 11:45:41 -0700
Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Dominick Grift <dac.override@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:07:45PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We've had a user report the following backtrace from the bridge module
> >> with a recent Linus' tree. Has anything like this been reported yet?
> >> If you have any questions on setup, the user is CC'd.
> >>
> >> josh
> >>
> >> [ 29.382235] br0: port 1(tap0) entered forwarding state
> >>
> >> [ 29.382286] ===============================
> >> [ 29.382315] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> >> [ 29.382344] 4.1.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc23.x86_64 #1 Not tainted
> >> [ 29.382380] -------------------------------
> >> [ 29.382409] net/bridge/br_private.h:626 suspicious
> >> rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > With 4.1.0-0.rc1.git1.1.fc23.x86_64 the situation seems to have slightly changed:
> >
>
> Should be the same issue. Please give the attached patch a try,
> it is compile-tested only.
>
> Thanks!
Good analysis in identifying the issue. But the proposed patch
doesn't seem right.
The br->lock protects against changes to the bridge port state.
vlan_info should be treated as part of the bridge state.
The correct fix is to get vlan_info out of depending on RTNL
and use br->lock to control modifications.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 17:07 [Bridge] Suspicious RCU usage in bridge with Linux v4.0-9362-g1fc149933fd4 Josh Boyer
2015-04-23 17:07 ` Josh Boyer
2015-04-23 17:35 ` [Bridge] " Sudeep Holla
2015-04-23 17:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-23 22:53 ` [Bridge] " Cong Wang
2015-04-23 22:53 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-04 13:39 ` Dominick Grift
2015-05-04 18:45 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-04 20:27 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-05-04 21:35 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-11 13:15 ` Dominick Grift
2015-05-11 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-11 17:42 ` Dominick Grift
2015-05-12 0:13 ` poma
2015-05-12 0:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-12 1:33 ` poma
2015-05-12 18:27 ` Dominick Grift
2015-05-21 19:22 ` Josh Boyer
2015-05-21 20:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-05 2:32 ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-05-04 20:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-04 21:38 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-04 22:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-04 22:17 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-04 22:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-04 22:44 ` Cong Wang
2015-05-04 23:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-04 23:22 ` David Miller
2015-05-05 8:33 ` Dominick Grift
2015-05-21 20:28 ` [PATCH net] bridge: fix lockdep splat Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504132714.55dca5b0@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
--cc=dac.override@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.