From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, wim@iguana.be, a.zummo@towertech.it,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: sti: Provide support for the ST LPC Clocksource IP
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508102834.GC29044@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431079797.13593.28.camel@x220>
On Fri, 08 May 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:38 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>=20
> > +config CLKSRC_ST_LPC
> > + bool
> > + depends on ARCH_STI
>=20
> By itself this does nothing. You can't set this symbol to 'y', even if
> ARCH_STI is 'y', right? Of course, ARCH_STI will select this symbol (see
> 11/12) otherwise it would be inert. But as ARCH_STI selects
> CLKSRC_ST_LPC I'd say this dependency isn't actually needed.
I guess this is more of a representative dependency, but you're right,
the likelihood is that no one is likely to accidentally enable it.
I can remove it.
> Are other selects of CLKSRC_ST_LPC expected to be added in the future?
> If not, CLKSRC_ST_LPC should operate in lockstep with ARCH_STI. In that
> case you might as well not bother with CLKSRC_ST_LPC and use ARCH_STI
> directly. (But that forces you to move the select statement below into
> the ARCH_STI entry, which might be ugly.)
Although true, there might be cases where we need to stop this from
being enabled on all ARCH_STI platforms. It'll be easier to move
CLKSRC_ST_LPC around in arch code than to start renaming this symbol.
I'd prefer to keep this as CLKSRC_ST_LPC if you're not passionate
about the alternative.
> > + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > + help
> > + Enable this option to use the Low Power controller timer
> > + as clocksource.
>=20
> (Please add an empty line.)
I believe the new line comes in the next patch.
--=20
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--=20
--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux".
Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux .
Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist
before submitting a driver.
---=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
rtc-linux" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, wim@iguana.be, a.zummo@towertech.it,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: sti: Provide support for the ST LPC Clocksource IP
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508102834.GC29044@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431079797.13593.28.camel@x220>
On Fri, 08 May 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:38 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>
> > +config CLKSRC_ST_LPC
> > + bool
> > + depends on ARCH_STI
>
> By itself this does nothing. You can't set this symbol to 'y', even if
> ARCH_STI is 'y', right? Of course, ARCH_STI will select this symbol (see
> 11/12) otherwise it would be inert. But as ARCH_STI selects
> CLKSRC_ST_LPC I'd say this dependency isn't actually needed.
I guess this is more of a representative dependency, but you're right,
the likelihood is that no one is likely to accidentally enable it.
I can remove it.
> Are other selects of CLKSRC_ST_LPC expected to be added in the future?
> If not, CLKSRC_ST_LPC should operate in lockstep with ARCH_STI. In that
> case you might as well not bother with CLKSRC_ST_LPC and use ARCH_STI
> directly. (But that forces you to move the select statement below into
> the ARCH_STI entry, which might be ugly.)
Although true, there might be cases where we need to stop this from
being enabled on all ARCH_STI platforms. It'll be easier to move
CLKSRC_ST_LPC around in arch code than to start renaming this symbol.
I'd prefer to keep this as CLKSRC_ST_LPC if you're not passionate
about the alternative.
> > + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > + help
> > + Enable this option to use the Low Power controller timer
> > + as clocksource.
>
> (Please add an empty line.)
I believe the new line comes in the next patch.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: sti: Provide support for the ST LPC Clocksource IP
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508102834.GC29044@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431079797.13593.28.camel@x220>
On Fri, 08 May 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:38 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>
> > +config CLKSRC_ST_LPC
> > + bool
> > + depends on ARCH_STI
>
> By itself this does nothing. You can't set this symbol to 'y', even if
> ARCH_STI is 'y', right? Of course, ARCH_STI will select this symbol (see
> 11/12) otherwise it would be inert. But as ARCH_STI selects
> CLKSRC_ST_LPC I'd say this dependency isn't actually needed.
I guess this is more of a representative dependency, but you're right,
the likelihood is that no one is likely to accidentally enable it.
I can remove it.
> Are other selects of CLKSRC_ST_LPC expected to be added in the future?
> If not, CLKSRC_ST_LPC should operate in lockstep with ARCH_STI. In that
> case you might as well not bother with CLKSRC_ST_LPC and use ARCH_STI
> directly. (But that forces you to move the select statement below into
> the ARCH_STI entry, which might be ugly.)
Although true, there might be cases where we need to stop this from
being enabled on all ARCH_STI platforms. It'll be easier to move
CLKSRC_ST_LPC around in arch code than to start renaming this symbol.
I'd prefer to keep this as CLKSRC_ST_LPC if you're not passionate
about the alternative.
> > + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > + help
> > + Enable this option to use the Low Power controller timer
> > + as clocksource.
>
> (Please add an empty line.)
I believe the new line comes in the next patch.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, wim@iguana.be, a.zummo@towertech.it,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux@roeck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: sti: Provide support for the ST LPC Clocksource IP
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:28:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150508102834.GC29044@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431079797.13593.28.camel@x220>
On Fri, 08 May 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 14:38 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>
> > +config CLKSRC_ST_LPC
> > + bool
> > + depends on ARCH_STI
>
> By itself this does nothing. You can't set this symbol to 'y', even if
> ARCH_STI is 'y', right? Of course, ARCH_STI will select this symbol (see
> 11/12) otherwise it would be inert. But as ARCH_STI selects
> CLKSRC_ST_LPC I'd say this dependency isn't actually needed.
I guess this is more of a representative dependency, but you're right,
the likelihood is that no one is likely to accidentally enable it.
I can remove it.
> Are other selects of CLKSRC_ST_LPC expected to be added in the future?
> If not, CLKSRC_ST_LPC should operate in lockstep with ARCH_STI. In that
> case you might as well not bother with CLKSRC_ST_LPC and use ARCH_STI
> directly. (But that forces you to move the select statement below into
> the ARCH_STI entry, which might be ugly.)
Although true, there might be cases where we need to stop this from
being enabled on all ARCH_STI platforms. It'll be easier to move
CLKSRC_ST_LPC around in arch code than to start renaming this symbol.
I'd prefer to keep this as CLKSRC_ST_LPC if you're not passionate
about the alternative.
> > + select CLKSRC_OF if OF
> > + help
> > + Enable this option to use the Low Power controller timer
> > + as clocksource.
>
> (Please add an empty line.)
I believe the new line comes in the next patch.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 170+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 13:38 [rtc-linux] [PATCH 00/12] mfd: watchdog: rtc: Add LPC Clocksource driver Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 01/12] mfd: dt-bindings: Provide human readable define for Clocksource mode Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 02/12] clocksource: sti: Provide support for the ST LPC Clocksource IP Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 15:04 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 15:04 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 15:04 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 15:04 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:13 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:13 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:09 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 10:09 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 10:09 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 10:09 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 10:28 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-05-08 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 11:30 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 11:30 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 11:30 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-11 8:42 ` [rtc-linux] " Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 10:53 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 03/12] clocksource: sti: Provide 'use timer as sched clock' capability Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 8:44 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 8:44 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 8:44 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 8:44 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 9:36 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-08 9:36 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 9:36 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 9:36 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 9:36 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 9:52 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 9:52 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 9:52 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 9:52 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 10:29 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 11:47 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 11:47 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 11:47 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-08 11:47 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-11 8:47 ` [rtc-linux] " Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 8:47 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-05-11 9:22 ` [rtc-linux] " Paul Bolle
2015-05-11 9:22 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-11 9:22 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 04/12] clocksource: bindings: Provide bindings for ST's LPC Clocksource device Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 05/12] watchdog: st_wdt: Update IP layout information to include Clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 0:04 ` [rtc-linux] " Guenter Roeck
2015-05-08 0:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-08 0:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-08 0:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 06/12] watchdog: bindings: Supply knowledge of a third supported device - clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 14:18 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:18 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:18 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:18 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:19 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:55 ` [rtc-linux] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:55 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:55 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:55 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-08 6:49 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 6:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 7:16 ` [rtc-linux] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-08 7:16 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-08 7:16 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-08 7:16 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-08 7:25 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-08 7:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 7:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 7:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-08 7:25 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 07/12] rtc: st: Update IP layout information to include Clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-09 13:58 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-09 13:58 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-11 10:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 10:54 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 11:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-11 11:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-11 11:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-11 11:03 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-05-11 11:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 11:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 11:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 11:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-11 11:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 08/12] rtc: bindings: Supply knowledge of a third supported device - clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 14:12 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:12 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:12 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:21 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:21 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 09/12] MAINTAINERS: Add the LPC Clocksource to STi maintained driver list Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 10/12] ARM: STi: DT: STih407: Switch LPC mode from RTC to Clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 11/12] ARM: STi: Enable LPC Clocksource Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` [rtc-linux] [PATCH 12/12] ARM: STi: Update platform level menuconfig 'help' Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 13:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 14:15 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [STLinux Kernel] " Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:15 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 14:15 ` Peter Griffin
2015-05-07 19:20 ` [rtc-linux] " Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-07 19:20 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150508102834.GC29044@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.