From: josh@joshtriplett.org
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and RCU-bh for Tiny RCU
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:59:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513005929.GE14292@cloud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431470953-4910-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:49:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reported-by: "Ahmed, Iftekhar" <ahmedi@onid.oregonstate.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Could you elaborate a bit more on this patch (ideally in its commit
message)? I see an addition of a command-line parameter to test rcu_bh;
is rcu-sched already tested elsewhere by some other config, or does this
parameter somehow enable testing both?
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> index 0f0802730014..6c1a292a65fb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TINY02.boot
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1
> rcupdate.rcu_self_test_bh=1
> +rcutorture.torture_type=rcu_bh
> --
> 1.8.1.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 22:48 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Tiny RCU updates for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Further shrink Tiny RCU by making empty functions static inlines Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcutorture: Test both RCU-sched and RCU-bh for Tiny RCU Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 0:59 ` josh [this message]
2015-05-13 13:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 13:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 16:32 ` Josh Triplett
2015-05-12 22:49 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Correctly handle non-empty Tiny RCU callback list with none ready Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 0:58 ` josh
2015-05-13 13:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 0:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Further shrink Tiny RCU by making empty functions static inlines josh
2015-05-13 12:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513005929.GE14292@cloud \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.