From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm, numa: Really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:10:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513081053.GQ2462@suse.de> (raw)
NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of num_online_nodes
(online nodes). The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1
or higher will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due
to minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1;
vanilla patched
NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0
NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0
NUMA page range updates 5442374 0
NUMA hint faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local percent 100 100
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v3.8+
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ede26291d4aa..747743237d9f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
if (numabalancing_override)
set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
- if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+ if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm, numa: Really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:10:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513081053.GQ2462@suse.de> (raw)
NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of num_online_nodes
(online nodes). The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1
or higher will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due
to minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1;
vanilla patched
NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0
NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0
NUMA page range updates 5442374 0
NUMA hint faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local percent 100 100
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #v3.8+
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index ede26291d4aa..747743237d9f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_enable(void)
if (numabalancing_override)
set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
- if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+ if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 8:10 Mel Gorman [this message]
2015-05-13 8:10 ` [PATCH] mm, numa: Really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines Mel Gorman
2015-05-13 13:07 ` Rik van Riel
2015-05-13 13:07 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513081053.GQ2462@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.