From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"open list:PERFORMANCE EVENT..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 12:40:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514104059.GA27771@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431588493-1474-3-git-send-email-milos@redhat.com>
* Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> wrote:
> Use new read/write locks when accesing buildid directory on places where
> we may race if multiple instances are run simultaneously.
Dunno, this will create locking interaction between multiple instances
of perf - hanging each other, etc.
And it seems unnecessary: the buildid hierarchy is already spread out.
What kind of races might there be?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-14 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 7:28 [PATCH 0/2] Add perf debug dir locking Milos Vyletel
2015-05-14 7:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/tools: add read/write buildid dir locks Milos Vyletel
2015-05-14 7:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use Milos Vyletel
2015-05-14 10:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-14 11:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-05-14 15:44 ` Milos Vyletel
2015-05-14 17:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-14 17:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-20 7:27 ` Milos Vyletel
2015-06-03 11:13 ` Milos Vyletel
2015-06-03 11:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-03 11:27 ` Milos Vyletel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150514104059.GA27771@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=milos@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.