From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Shailendra Verma
<shailendra.capricorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:20:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519065025.GA5061@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519062046.GB4448-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here.
>
> While technically true...
>
> > When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset
> > of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will
> > search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series.
>
> ... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously
> have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other
> subsystems. This is fine, too.
yes, I also asssumed the same. But it turned out that he has sent 10/10
on 15th May, and then 11/11 , 12/12 , 13/13 and 14/14 on May 18th.
So I assumed that it is a wrong setting while creating his patch.
isn't it?
regards
sudip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 12:20:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519065025.GA5061@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519062046.GB4448@schokonusskuchen.bad>
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here.
>
> While technically true...
>
> > When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset
> > of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will
> > search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series.
>
> ... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously
> have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other
> subsystems. This is fine, too.
yes, I also asssumed the same. But it turned out that he has sent 10/10
on 15th May, and then 11/11 , 12/12 , 13/13 and 14/14 on May 18th.
So I assumed that it is a wrong setting while creating his patch.
isn't it?
regards
sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 16:54 [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment Shailendra Verma
2015-05-18 16:54 ` Shailendra Verma
[not found] ` <1431968041-3226-1-git-send-email-shailendra.capricorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 4:48 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-19 4:48 ` Sudip Mukherjee
[not found] ` <CA+tKcn8exGWjb5Ttr9fMtKhSA_NKf2umZs5JDtC+uTfLKc9fAA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CA+tKcn8exGWjb5Ttr9fMtKhSA_NKf2umZs5JDtC+uTfLKc9fAA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 5:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-19 5:55 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-19 6:20 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150519062046.GB4448-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 6:50 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-05-19 6:50 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-31 23:43 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150519065025.GA5061@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shailendra.capricorn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.