All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Mika Westerberg
	<mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: separate ops for system_sleep_pm and runtime_pm
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:32:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519203242.74617ad6@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518082823.GH1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

Dear Mika,

On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:23 +0300
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:31:39PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Commit 1fc2fe204cb9 ("i2c: designware: Add runtime PM hooks") adds
> > runtime pm support using the same ops for system sleep and runtime pm.
> > When suspend to ram, the i2c host may have been runtime suspended, thus
> > i2c_dw_disable() hangs.
> 
> It hangs because it has already been powered off, right?

Either be powered off or clock gated or even both.

> 
> > This patch fixes this issue by separating ops for system sleep pm and
> > runtime pm, and in the system suspend/resume path, runtime pm apis are
> > used to ensure the device is at correct state.
> 
> I can see that this fixes the issue with the platform driver (as the
> platform bus core doesn't power on the device automatically as opposed
> to other buses, like PCI). However, I'm thinking that can we do better
> here.
> 
> Instead of powering the device on again, can't we leave it in low power
> state? Recently added 'dev->power.direct_complete' may be used to
> achieve that, I think.

how to handle runtime suspended via just being clock gated? Currently the
only solution is using the runtime pm apis to ensure the device is in a working
state during s2ram. What's your opinion?

Thanks,
Jisheng

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: designware: separate ops for system_sleep_pm and runtime_pm
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:32:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519203242.74617ad6@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518082823.GH1490@lahna.fi.intel.com>

Dear Mika,

On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:23 +0300
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:31:39PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Commit 1fc2fe204cb9 ("i2c: designware: Add runtime PM hooks") adds
> > runtime pm support using the same ops for system sleep and runtime pm.
> > When suspend to ram, the i2c host may have been runtime suspended, thus
> > i2c_dw_disable() hangs.
> 
> It hangs because it has already been powered off, right?

Either be powered off or clock gated or even both.

> 
> > This patch fixes this issue by separating ops for system sleep pm and
> > runtime pm, and in the system suspend/resume path, runtime pm apis are
> > used to ensure the device is at correct state.
> 
> I can see that this fixes the issue with the platform driver (as the
> platform bus core doesn't power on the device automatically as opposed
> to other buses, like PCI). However, I'm thinking that can we do better
> here.
> 
> Instead of powering the device on again, can't we leave it in low power
> state? Recently added 'dev->power.direct_complete' may be used to
> achieve that, I think.

how to handle runtime suspended via just being clock gated? Currently the
only solution is using the runtime pm apis to ensure the device is in a working
state during s2ram. What's your opinion?

Thanks,
Jisheng

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <wsa@the-dreams.de>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: separate ops for system_sleep_pm and runtime_pm
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 20:32:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519203242.74617ad6@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518082823.GH1490@lahna.fi.intel.com>

Dear Mika,

On Mon, 18 May 2015 11:28:23 +0300
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:31:39PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Commit 1fc2fe204cb9 ("i2c: designware: Add runtime PM hooks") adds
> > runtime pm support using the same ops for system sleep and runtime pm.
> > When suspend to ram, the i2c host may have been runtime suspended, thus
> > i2c_dw_disable() hangs.
> 
> It hangs because it has already been powered off, right?

Either be powered off or clock gated or even both.

> 
> > This patch fixes this issue by separating ops for system sleep pm and
> > runtime pm, and in the system suspend/resume path, runtime pm apis are
> > used to ensure the device is at correct state.
> 
> I can see that this fixes the issue with the platform driver (as the
> platform bus core doesn't power on the device automatically as opposed
> to other buses, like PCI). However, I'm thinking that can we do better
> here.
> 
> Instead of powering the device on again, can't we leave it in low power
> state? Recently added 'dev->power.direct_complete' may be used to
> achieve that, I think.

how to handle runtime suspended via just being clock gated? Currently the
only solution is using the runtime pm apis to ensure the device is in a working
state during s2ram. What's your opinion?

Thanks,
Jisheng

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-19 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 12:31 [PATCH] i2c: designware: separate ops for system_sleep_pm and runtime_pm Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-15 12:31 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-15 12:31 ` Jisheng Zhang
     [not found] ` <1431693099-2292-1-git-send-email-jszhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-18  8:28   ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-18  8:28     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-18  8:28     ` Mika Westerberg
     [not found]     ` <20150518082823.GH1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 12:32       ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2015-05-19 12:32         ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-19 12:32         ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-19 13:15         ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-19 13:15           ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-19 13:15           ` Mika Westerberg
     [not found]           ` <20150519131516.GO1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 11:34             ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 11:34               ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 11:34               ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:05               ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:05                 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:05                 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:15               ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-20 12:15                 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-20 12:15                 ` Mika Westerberg
     [not found]                 ` <20150520121506.GU1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 12:34                   ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:34                     ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:34                     ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:38                     ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:38                       ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:38                       ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-05-20 12:55                     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-20 12:55                       ` Mika Westerberg
2015-05-20 12:55                       ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150519203242.74617ad6@xhacker \
    --to=jszhang-eyqppykdwxrbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.