From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [EDT][PATCH 1/1] hw_breakpoint.c :cpu hotplug handling
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520165025.GF11498@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1973496787.315501431924391025.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas08c>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:46:31AM +0100, Vaneet Narang wrote:
> EP-2DAD0AFA905A4ACB804C4F82A001242F
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:24:06AM +0100, Maninder Singh wrote:
> >> EP-2DAD0AFA905A4ACB804C4F82A001242F
> >>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] hw_breakpoint.c :cpu hotplug handling
> >>
> >> This patch adds support for CPU hotplug, It re-installl all installed watchpoints and breakpoints
> >> back on H/W in case of cpu-hot plug.
>
> >Not sure why this is needed -- the scheduler should reinstall the
> >breakpoints when the debugged task gets scheduled in via
> >arch_install_hw_breakpoint.
> >
> >Will
>
> I agree with you this reinstalling has to be either take care by scheduler
> or Debug tool.
Which debug tool? If it's a ptrace user, then the scheduler should still
manage this, as ptrace will call into perf to create the breakpoints.
> In current implementation we clear H/W registers but we don't clear slots
> (wp_on_reg / bp_on_reg) for both watchpoint or breakpoint.
Ok, so are you saying that when the CPU is hotplugged off, the active
breakpoints aren't being uninstalled by perf? I thought this would have
happened as a result of the scheduler migrating the current task away
from the dying CPU.
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
Cc: Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Amit Arora <amit.arora@samsung.com>,
AJEET YADAV <ajeet.y@samsung.com>,
AKHILESH KUMAR <akhilesh.k@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [EDT][PATCH 1/1] hw_breakpoint.c :cpu hotplug handling
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520165025.GF11498@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1973496787.315501431924391025.JavaMail.weblogic@ep2mlwas08c>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:46:31AM +0100, Vaneet Narang wrote:
> EP-2DAD0AFA905A4ACB804C4F82A001242F
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:24:06AM +0100, Maninder Singh wrote:
> >> EP-2DAD0AFA905A4ACB804C4F82A001242F
> >>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] hw_breakpoint.c :cpu hotplug handling
> >>
> >> This patch adds support for CPU hotplug, It re-installl all installed watchpoints and breakpoints
> >> back on H/W in case of cpu-hot plug.
>
> >Not sure why this is needed -- the scheduler should reinstall the
> >breakpoints when the debugged task gets scheduled in via
> >arch_install_hw_breakpoint.
> >
> >Will
>
> I agree with you this reinstalling has to be either take care by scheduler
> or Debug tool.
Which debug tool? If it's a ptrace user, then the scheduler should still
manage this, as ptrace will call into perf to create the breakpoints.
> In current implementation we clear H/W registers but we don't clear slots
> (wp_on_reg / bp_on_reg) for both watchpoint or breakpoint.
Ok, so are you saying that when the CPU is hotplugged off, the active
breakpoints aren't being uninstalled by perf? I thought this would have
happened as a result of the scheduler migrating the current task away
from the dying CPU.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 4:46 [EDT][PATCH 1/1] hw_breakpoint.c :cpu hotplug handling Vaneet Narang
2015-05-20 16:50 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-05-20 16:50 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-13 5:24 Maninder Singh
2015-05-13 5:24 ` Maninder Singh
2015-05-13 5:33 ` Baruch Siach
2015-05-13 5:33 ` Baruch Siach
2015-05-13 16:08 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-13 16:08 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150520165025.GF11498@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.