From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: re: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Unify init code and obtain hw specific bits from DT
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 17:32:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150523173245.GA31663@mwanda> (raw)
Hello Thomas Niederprüm,
The patch a3998fe03e87: "fbdev: ssd1307fb: Unify init code and obtain
hw specific bits from DT" from Mar 31, 2015, leads to the following
static checker warning:
drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c:371 ssd1307fb_init()
warn: add some parenthesis here?
drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
366 /* Set COM pins configuration */
367 ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, SSD1307FB_SET_COM_PINS_CONFIG);
368 if (ret < 0)
369 return ret;
370
371 compins = 0x02 | (!par->com_seq & 0x1) << 4
372 | (par->com_lrremap & 0x1) << 5;
Smatch is complaining because it's normally "!par->com_seq & 0x1" is
a bug and "!(par->com_seq & 0x1)" is intended. I don't know what was
intended here though. If the current code is correct, you can silence
the static checker warning by writing it as "(!par->com_seq) & 0x1".
But I also have a hard time remembering if | or << is higher precedence
so that might be clearer with parenthesis as well even though the code
is clearly correct when I google for "order of operations" in C.
373 ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, compins);
374 if (ret < 0)
375 return ret;
regards,
dan carpenter
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-23 17:32 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-05-25 5:12 ` fbdev: ssd1307fb: Unify init code and obtain hw specific bits from DT Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-25 7:34 ` Thomas Niederprüm
2015-05-25 9:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-25 10:40 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150523173245.GA31663@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.