From: Zidan Wang <zidan.wang@freescale.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for clock divisor calculation
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:02:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526110246.GA13725@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150525152424.GA8164@Asurada>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:24:25AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:13:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Nicolin,
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Is that possible for you to provisionally revert this patch?
> > > I wanted to wait for the test result from Fabio or Zidan in
> > > the Cc list because I don't have a test environment for SPDIF
> > > even though this change seems to make sense.
> >
> > I currently don't have access to a SPDIF receiver to test it.
>
> Okay, let's wait for Zidan then. We only need to test the
> playback route of supporting sample rates.
>
> Thanks
> Nicolin
I don't have the board which supported by community to test spdif out. So i used the imx7 board
and test it with internal branch.
I found that (txclk_df + 1) is better than txclk_df.
I suspect the patch for clk_round_rate() is not in our branch. Could you please tell me which
patch is for clk_round_rate? I want to cherry-pick it to our branch and test it.
Best Regards,
Zidan Wang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zidan Wang <zidan.wang@freescale.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for clock divisor calculation
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:02:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526110246.GA13725@shlinux2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150525152424.GA8164@Asurada>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:24:25AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:13:45PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Nicolin,
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Is that possible for you to provisionally revert this patch?
> > > I wanted to wait for the test result from Fabio or Zidan in
> > > the Cc list because I don't have a test environment for SPDIF
> > > even though this change seems to make sense.
> >
> > I currently don't have access to a SPDIF receiver to test it.
>
> Okay, let's wait for Zidan then. We only need to test the
> playback route of supporting sample rates.
>
> Thanks
> Nicolin
I don't have the board which supported by community to test spdif out. So i used the imx7 board
and test it with internal branch.
I found that (txclk_df + 1) is better than txclk_df.
I suspect the patch for clk_round_rate() is not in our branch. Could you please tell me which
patch is for clk_round_rate? I want to cherry-pick it to our branch and test it.
Best Regards,
Zidan Wang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-24 8:12 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Don't try to round-up for clock divisor calculation Nicolin Chen
2015-05-25 11:58 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-25 15:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2015-05-25 15:13 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-05-25 15:13 ` [alsa-devel] " Fabio Estevam
2015-05-25 15:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2015-05-26 11:02 ` Zidan Wang [this message]
2015-05-26 11:02 ` Zidan Wang
2015-05-26 23:00 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150526110246.GA13725@shlinux2 \
--to=zidan.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.