All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Shuey <shuey@purdue.edu>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Drokin,
	Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 02:24:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqvwjtPdX4yfEob+LwurrT=ACdhNkwS8u9Zh9-gjBH6oo56Nw@mail.gmail.com>

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> Ah - that explains it.  I added additional files to the series, but
> simply re-applied the original round of patches.  They would've not
> been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
> files had v4 in the subject.

The way you sent these is a mess, I can't sort by subject and apply them
properly.

Either put the v4 at the front, for all patches, like this:
	[PATCH v4 01/13]
or at the end of the number:
	[PATCH 01/13 v4]
so I can sort them.

Please fix up and resend this series, I've dropped it from my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:24:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqvwjtPdX4yfEob+LwurrT=ACdhNkwS8u9Zh9-gjBH6oo56Nw@mail.gmail.com>

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> Ah - that explains it.  I added additional files to the series, but
> simply re-applied the original round of patches.  They would've not
> been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
> files had v4 in the subject.

The way you sent these is a mess, I can't sort by subject and apply them
properly.

Either put the v4 at the front, for all patches, like this:
	[PATCH v4 01/13]
or at the end of the number:
	[PATCH 01/13 v4]
so I can sort them.

Please fix up and resend this series, I've dropped it from my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Shuey <shuey@purdue.edu>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Drokin,
	Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
	HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 11:24:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqvwjtPdX4yfEob+LwurrT=ACdhNkwS8u9Zh9-gjBH6oo56Nw@mail.gmail.com>

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Michael Shuey wrote:
> Ah - that explains it.  I added additional files to the series, but
> simply re-applied the original round of patches.  They would've not
> been tagged as v4, while the patches pertaining to the newly-modified
> files had v4 in the subject.

The way you sent these is a mess, I can't sort by subject and apply them
properly.

Either put the v4 at the front, for all patches, like this:
	[PATCH v4 01/13]
or at the end of the number:
	[PATCH 01/13 v4]
so I can sort them.

Please fix up and resend this series, I've dropped it from my queue.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-31  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21 19:50 [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: code cleanups - variable declarations Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove lnet_fini_locks Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove LNetSetAsync Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: Module is LNet, not Portals Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] staging: lustre: lnet: o2iblnd: code cleanup - align whitespace Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 13:03   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 13:03     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: code cleanup - align spacing Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: code cleanup - variable spacing, indentation Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] staging: lustre: lnet: remove LNET_MUTEX_LOCK macro Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: remove dead code, fix checkpatch.pl issue Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 21:00   ` Joe Perches
2015-05-21 21:00     ` Joe Perches
2015-05-21 21:29     ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-21 21:29       ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-21 22:04       ` [lustre-devel] " Michael Shuey
2015-05-22  2:46         ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22  2:46           ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22  2:46           ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-22  5:06         ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-22  5:06           ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-22  5:06           ` [lustre-devel] " Julia Lawall
2015-05-22  8:08           ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22  8:08             ` [lustre-devel] " Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 15:42             ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 15:42               ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 15:42               ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-22 21:16               ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 21:16                 ` [lustre-devel] " Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 23:57                 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 23:57                   ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 23:57                   ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:07                   ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23  0:07                     ` [lustre-devel] " Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23  0:18                     ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:18                       ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:18                       ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:25                       ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23  0:25                         ` [lustre-devel] " Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23  0:36                         ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:36                           ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23  0:36                           ` [lustre-devel] " Joe Perches
2015-05-23  3:13                           ` [HPDD-discuss] " Patrick Farrell
2015-05-23  3:13                             ` [lustre-devel] " Patrick Farrell
     [not found]     ` <CABqvwjs=S1VrCHe7M4JnDikGBVN3yqjNMrtSA=UvftGmxSasRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-22  3:06       ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22  3:06         ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22  8:04       ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 10:00         ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-22 10:00           ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-23  6:28     ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Categorize some long line length checks Joe Perches
2015-05-23  6:28       ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 11:32       ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-23 11:32         ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-23 17:26         ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 17:26           ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 18:07           ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 18:07             ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 18:13             ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 18:13               ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 18:21               ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 18:21                 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-24  2:49           ` [PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] staging: lnet: o2iblnd: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 10:49   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 10:49     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: checkpatch.pl cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: code cleanups - variable declarations Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove lnet_fini_locks Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove LNetSetAsync Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: Module is LNet, not Portals Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] staging: lustre: lnet: o2iblnd: code cleanup - align whitespace Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: code cleanup - align spacing Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: code cleanup - variable spacing, indentation Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] staging: lustre: lnet: remove LNET_MUTEX_LOCK macro Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: remove dead code, fix checkpatch.pl issue Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] staging: lnet: o2iblnd: " Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: checkpatch.pl cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50   ` Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 10:55   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 10:55     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22  9:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22  9:21   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 22:48   ` [lustre-devel] " Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 10:14     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 10:14       ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 10:14       ` [lustre-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 12:09       ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 12:09         ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 12:09         ` [lustre-devel] " Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 12:39         ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-23 12:51           ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-23 12:39           ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-23 14:05           ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 14:05             ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 14:05             ` [lustre-devel] " Michael Shuey
2015-05-31  2:24             ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-05-31  2:24               ` Greg KH
2015-05-31  2:24               ` [lustre-devel] " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150531022456.GA30873@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
    --cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
    --cc=shuey@purdue.edu \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.