From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Vasily Isaenko <vasily.isaenko@oracle.com>,
"SHUANG.QIU" <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: nfsd: EACCES vs EPERM on utime()/utimes() calls
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 17:23:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601212317.GF26972@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556C73AE.4090900@oracle.com>
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:01:02PM +0300, Stanislav Kholmanskikh wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As the man page for utime/utimes states [1], EPERM is returned if
> the second argument of utime/utimes is not NULL and:
> * the caller's effective user id does not match the owner of the file
> * the caller does not have write access to the file
> * the caller is not privileged
>
> However, I don't see this behavior with NFS, I see EACCES is
> generated instead.
Agreed that it's probably a server bug. (Have you run across a case
where this makes a difference?)
Looking at nfsd_setattr().... The main work is done by notify_change(),
which is probably doing the right thing. But before that there's an
fh_verify()--looks like that is expected to fail in your case. I bet
that's the cause.
--b.
>
> Please, consider this test:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> #include <utime.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> struct utimbuf u = { .actime = 0, .modtime = 0 };
> struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 0 };
>
> if (utime(argv[1], &u))
> perror("utime() failed");
>
> if (utimes(argv[1], &tv))
> perror("utimes() failed");
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> In my environment the kernel is 4.1.0-rc6 x86_64, and there are 2
> NFS mounted directories:
> 127.0.0.1:/opt/export/disk0 on /mnt/lin type nfs (rw,vers=3,addr=127.0.0.1)
> 192.168.0.12:/export/bla on /mnt/sol type nfs (rw,vers=3,addr=192.168.0.12)
>
> /mnt/sol is from Solaris 11.2 x86_64. /opt/export/disk0 is handled
> by the in-kernel nfs server.
>
> Execution of the above test program gives:
>
> * the server is Linux -> EACCES is generated:
>
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ ls -l /mnt/lin/test_file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 1 17:28 /mnt/lin/test_file
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ strace -e utime,utimes ./utime_test /mnt/lin/test_file
> utime("/mnt/lin/test_file", [0, 0]) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
> utime() failed: Permission denied
> utimes("/mnt/lin/test_file", {{0, 0}, {0, 0}}) = -1 EACCES
> (Permission denied)
> utimes() failed: Permission denied
>
> * the server is Solaris 11.2 -> EPERM is generated
>
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ ls -l /mnt/sol/test_file
> -rw-r--r--+ 1 root root 0 Jun 1 2015 /mnt/sol/test_file
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ strace -e utime,utimes ./utime_test /mnt/sol/test_file
> utime("/mnt/sol/test_file", [0, 0]) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
> utime() failed: Operation not permitted
> utimes("/mnt/sol/test_file", {{0, 0}, {0, 0}}) = -1 EPERM (Operation
> not permitted)
> utimes() failed: Operation not permitted
>
> * on a local ext4 file system EPERM is generated:
>
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ ls -l /tmp/test_file
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jun 1 17:51 /tmp/test_file
> [stas@ol6-x64 tmp]$ strace -e utime,utimes ./utime_test /tmp/test_file
> utime("/tmp/test_file", [0, 0]) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted)
> utime() failed: Operation not permitted
> utimes("/tmp/test_file", {{0, 0}, {0, 0}}) = -1 EPERM (Operation not
> permitted)
> utimes() failed: Operation not permitted
>
> Plus EPERM is generated when the NFS server is FreeBSD 9.1.
>
> Could anybody, clarify, if the described behavior a bug in the Linux
> NFS server implementation or not?
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/utime.2.html
>
> PS: this all was found using utime06, utimes01 LTP test cases.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-01 15:01 nfsd: EACCES vs EPERM on utime()/utimes() calls Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2015-06-01 21:23 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2015-06-02 16:09 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2015-06-04 12:43 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-06-04 20:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-06-05 0:50 ` Al Viro
2015-06-07 8:25 ` Kinglong Mee
2015-06-05 15:30 ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150601212317.GF26972@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuang.qiu@oracle.com \
--cc=stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com \
--cc=vasily.isaenko@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.