All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:03:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150609070347.GE2982@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608180718.GR14071@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:42:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Perhaps this is just personal preference, but ...
> 
> Possibly...
> 
> > Prevents this kind of nonsense:
> 
> > 	this->is->just.silly = fetch_silly_value(&pointer);
> > 	if (!this->is->just.silly) {
> > 		printk("Silly value failed: %d\n", this->is->just.silly);
> > 		return this->is->just.silly;
> > 	}
> 
> But we don't have any of that code?  Well, one if statement where we
> check config.init_data but that's it.  A temporary does help with things
> like the above but we're not doing that in this driver are we?

Admittedly this is an extreme example, but I do consider:

	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

... neater than:

	config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (!config.init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 08:03:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150609070347.GE2982@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608180718.GR14071@sirena.org.uk>

On Mon, 08 Jun 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:42:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Perhaps this is just personal preference, but ...
> 
> Possibly...
> 
> > Prevents this kind of nonsense:
> 
> > 	this->is->just.silly = fetch_silly_value(&pointer);
> > 	if (!this->is->just.silly) {
> > 		printk("Silly value failed: %d\n", this->is->just.silly);
> > 		return this->is->just.silly;
> > 	}
> 
> But we don't have any of that code?  Well, one if statement where we
> check config.init_data but that's it.  A temporary does help with things
> like the above but we're not doing that in this driver are we?

Admittedly this is an extreme example, but I do consider:

	init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

... neater than:

	config.init_data = of_get_regulator_init_data(<blah>);
	if (!config.init_data)
        	return -ENOMEM;

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-09  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 18:42 [PATCH 0/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Introduce continuous-mode Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: STi: STiH407: Add PWM Regulator node Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Remove unnecessary descriptor attribute from ddata Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-08 18:11     ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Remove superfluous is_enabled check Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-08 18:11     ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Diffientiate between dev (device) and rdev (regulator_dev) Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:11   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-08 18:11     ` Mark Brown
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Don't assign structure attributes right away Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-08 18:07   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-08 18:07     ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09  7:03     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-06-09  7:03       ` Lee Jones
2015-06-09 10:10       ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09 10:10         ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09 11:07         ` Lee Jones
2015-06-09 11:07           ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 6/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Separate voltage-table initialisation Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-09 17:14   ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09 17:14     ` Mark Brown
2015-06-10  7:58     ` Lee Jones
2015-06-10  7:58       ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 7/8] regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] dt: regulator: pwm-regulator: Re-write bindings Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:42   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:47   ` Lee Jones
2015-06-05 18:47     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150609070347.GE2982@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.