From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] scatterlist: use sg_phys()
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150611065056.GG20384@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gat8TG9YnHmvD_7A7RD00Urn=febCj2Uc_cVcPi+fnCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:00:31AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > So sg_phys() turns out to be 'page_to_phys(sg_page(s)) + s->offset',
> > which makes the above statement to:
> >
> > page_to_phys(sg_page(s)) + s->offset - s->offset;
> >
> > The compiler will probably optimize that away, but it still doesn't look
> > like an improvement.
>
> The goal is to eventually stop leaking struct page deep into the i/o
> stack. Anything that relies on being able to retrieve a struct page
> out of an sg entry needs to be converted. I think we need a new
> helper for this case "sg_phys_aligned()?".
You still have a reference to a struct page, because sg_phys() calls
sg_page() too. If you want to get rid of sg_page() something like
sg_pfn() migth be a more workable solution than sg_phys_(page_)aligned.
But maybe I am just missing the bigger scope of this, so I agree with
Russell that it is better so see a patch series which shows the
direction you want to go with this.
Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
"dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scatterlist: use sg_phys()
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150611065056.GG20384@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gat8TG9YnHmvD_7A7RD00Urn=febCj2Uc_cVcPi+fnCg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:00:31AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > So sg_phys() turns out to be 'page_to_phys(sg_page(s)) + s->offset',
> > which makes the above statement to:
> >
> > page_to_phys(sg_page(s)) + s->offset - s->offset;
> >
> > The compiler will probably optimize that away, but it still doesn't look
> > like an improvement.
>
> The goal is to eventually stop leaking struct page deep into the i/o
> stack. Anything that relies on being able to retrieve a struct page
> out of an sg entry needs to be converted. I think we need a new
> helper for this case "sg_phys_aligned()?".
You still have a reference to a struct page, because sg_phys() calls
sg_page() too. If you want to get rid of sg_page() something like
sg_pfn() migth be a more workable solution than sg_phys_(page_)aligned.
But maybe I am just missing the bigger scope of this, so I agree with
Russell that it is better so see a patch series which shows the
direction you want to go with this.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 16:27 [PATCH 0/2] scatterlist cleanups Dan Williams
2015-06-09 16:27 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-09 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] scatterlist: use sg_phys() Dan Williams
2015-06-09 16:27 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 0:34 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-06-10 0:34 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-06-10 9:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-10 9:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-10 16:00 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 16:00 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 16:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 17:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 17:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 17:25 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-11 6:50 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-06-11 6:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-09 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] scatterlist: cleanup sg_chain() and sg_unmark_end() Dan Williams
2015-06-09 16:27 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 5:38 ` Herbert Xu
2015-06-10 5:38 ` Herbert Xu
2015-06-11 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-11 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-11 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
2015-06-11 7:34 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150611065056.GG20384@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.