From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Remove pgd_list use from the memory hotplug code
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:24:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150613192454.GA1735@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434188955-31397-3-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> @@ -169,29 +169,40 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int removed)
>
> for (address = start; address <= end; address += PGDIR_SIZE) {
> const pgd_t *pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address);
> - struct page *page;
> + struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
> /*
> - * When it is called after memory hot remove, pgd_none()
> - * returns true. In this case (removed == 1), we must clear
> - * the PGD entries in the local PGD level page.
> + * When this function is called after memory hot remove,
> + * pgd_none() already returns true, but only the reference
> + * kernel PGD has been cleared, not the process PGDs.
> + *
> + * So clear the affected entries in every process PGD as well:
> */
> if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !removed)
> continue;
>
> - spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
> + spin_lock(&pgd_lock); /* Implies rcu_read_lock() for the task list iteration: */
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmm, but it doesn't if PREEMPT_RCU? No, no, I do not pretend I understand
how it actually works ;) But, say, rcu_check_callbacks() can be called from
irq and since spin_lock() doesn't increment current->rcu_read_lock_nesting
this can lead to rcu_preempt_qs()?
> + for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> pgd_t *pgd;
> spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>
> - pgd = (pgd_t *)page_address(page) + pgd_index(address);
> - /* the pgt_lock only for Xen */
> - pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
> + task_lock(p);
> + mm = p->mm;
> + if (!mm) {
> + task_unlock(p);
> + continue;
> + }
Again, you can simplify this code and avoid for_each_process_thread() if
you use for_each_process() + find_lock_task_mm().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Remove pgd_list use from the memory hotplug code
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:24:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150613192454.GA1735@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434188955-31397-3-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org>
On 06/13, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> @@ -169,29 +169,40 @@ void sync_global_pgds(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int removed)
>
> for (address = start; address <= end; address += PGDIR_SIZE) {
> const pgd_t *pgd_ref = pgd_offset_k(address);
> - struct page *page;
> + struct task_struct *g, *p;
>
> /*
> - * When it is called after memory hot remove, pgd_none()
> - * returns true. In this case (removed == 1), we must clear
> - * the PGD entries in the local PGD level page.
> + * When this function is called after memory hot remove,
> + * pgd_none() already returns true, but only the reference
> + * kernel PGD has been cleared, not the process PGDs.
> + *
> + * So clear the affected entries in every process PGD as well:
> */
> if (pgd_none(*pgd_ref) && !removed)
> continue;
>
> - spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) {
> + spin_lock(&pgd_lock); /* Implies rcu_read_lock() for the task list iteration: */
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hmm, but it doesn't if PREEMPT_RCU? No, no, I do not pretend I understand
how it actually works ;) But, say, rcu_check_callbacks() can be called from
irq and since spin_lock() doesn't increment current->rcu_read_lock_nesting
this can lead to rcu_preempt_qs()?
> + for_each_process_thread(g, p) {
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> pgd_t *pgd;
> spinlock_t *pgt_lock;
>
> - pgd = (pgd_t *)page_address(page) + pgd_index(address);
> - /* the pgt_lock only for Xen */
> - pgt_lock = &pgd_page_get_mm(page)->page_table_lock;
> + task_lock(p);
> + mm = p->mm;
> + if (!mm) {
> + task_unlock(p);
> + continue;
> + }
Again, you can simplify this code and avoid for_each_process_thread() if
you use for_each_process() + find_lock_task_mm().
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-13 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-13 9:49 [PATCH 00/12, v2] x86/mm: Implement lockless pgd_alloc()/pgd_free() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86/mm/pat: Don't free PGD entries on memory unmap Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Remove pgd_list use from the memory hotplug code Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-06-13 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 19:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-15 0:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-15 0:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-15 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-15 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Don't remove PGD entries in remove_pagetable() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Simplify sync_global_pgds() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 05/12] mm: Introduce arch_pgd_init_late() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: Enable and use the arch_pgd_init_late() method Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] x86/virt/guest/xen: Remove use of pgd_list from the Xen guest code Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 8:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-15 9:05 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 9:05 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 9:05 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-15 10:30 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 10:30 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 10:30 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-15 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-16 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 14:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-16 14:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-16 14:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-16 14:27 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 14:27 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 14:27 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-16 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-06-15 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86/mm: Remove pgd_list use from vmalloc_sync_all() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86/mm/pat/32: Remove pgd_list use from the PAT code Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86/mm: Make pgd_alloc()/pgd_free() lockless Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86/mm: Remove pgd_list leftovers Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86/mm: Simplify pgd_alloc() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-13 18:58 ` why do we need vmalloc_sync_all? Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-13 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-14 20:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-14 20:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-15 2:47 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-15 2:47 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-15 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-15 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-15 20:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-15 20:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-15 20:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-06-15 20:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-11 14:07 [RFC PATCH 00/12] x86/mm: Implement lockless pgd_alloc()/pgd_free() Ingo Molnar
2015-06-11 14:07 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86/mm/hotplug: Remove pgd_list use from the memory hotplug code Ingo Molnar
2015-06-12 22:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-12 22:48 ` Waiman Long
2015-06-13 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-12 23:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-06-13 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150613192454.GA1735@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.