Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/8] spapr: Reorganize CPU dt generation code

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1692 bytes --]

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:55:20PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 05:06 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:09:48PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>-        ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,pft-size",
> >>>-                          pft_size_prop, sizeof(pft_size_prop));
> >>
> >>You broke formatting here, above 8 lines should not be in the patch.
> >
> >You mean above 80 chars ? It is not above 80 chars.
> 
> The chunk is:
> 
> +        ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,pft-size",
> +                      pft_size_prop, sizeof(pft_size_prop));
> +        if (ret < 0) {
> +            return ret;
>          }
> 
> -        ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,pft-size",
> -                          pft_size_prop, sizeof(pft_size_prop));
> 
> 
> 
> pft_size_prop was under "fdt", now it is not, and this is the only change.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >>>+    _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "d-cache-block-size",
> >>>+                            env->dcache_line_size)));
> >>
> >>Wrong indent.
> >
> >checkpatch.pl doesn't complain, but should we start the second line
> >below ( of the first line ?
> 
> Below "(" plus 1 char right.
> 
> set expandtab, set tabstop=4, set shiftwidth=4, set cino=:0,(0  - this is
> what I use for QEMU.

Again, not a big deal, but I'd like a v2 of the series to address a
couple of other things, so you might as well correct the formatting at
the same time.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]