All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH linux-next v2 1/1] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix residue computation
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:35:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710080542.GD836@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9630cef4224b93939138b3a8c1950ea44cbcf59.1434626239.git.cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:25:41PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> As claimed by the programmer datasheet and confirmed by the IP designer,
> the Block Transfer Size (BTSIZE) bitfield of the Channel x Control A
> Register (CTRLAx) always refers to a number of Source Width (SRC_WIDTH)
> transfers.
> 
> Both the SRC_WIDTH and BTSIZE bitfields can be extacted from the CTRLAx
> register to compute the DMA residue. So the 'tx_width' field is useless
> and can be removed from the struct at_desc.
> 
> Before this patch, atc_prep_slave_sg() was not consistent: BTSIZE was
> correctly initialized according to the SRC_WIDTH but 'tx_width' was always
> set to reg_width, which was incorrect for MEM_TO_DEV transfers. It led to
> bad DMA residue when 'tx_width' != SRC_WIDTH.
> 
> Also the 'tx_width' field was mostly set only in the first and last
> descriptors. Depending on the kind of DMA transfer, this field remained
> uninitialized for intermediate descriptors. The accurate DMA residue was
> computed only when the currently processed descriptor was the first or the
> last of the chain. This algorithm was a little bit odd. An accurate DMA
> residue can always be computed using the SRC_WIDTH and BTSIZE bitfields
> in the CTRLAx register.
> 
> Finally, the test to check whether the currently processed descriptor is
> the last of the chain was wrong: for cyclic transfer, last_desc->lli.dscr
> is NOT equal to zero, since set_desc_eol() is never called, but logically
> equal to first_desc->txd.phys. This bug has a side effect on the
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c driver, which uses cyclic DMA transfer
> to receive data. Since the DMA residue was wrong each time the DMA
> transfer reaches the second (and last) period of the transfer, no more
> data were received by the USART driver till the cyclic DMA transfer loops
> back to the first period.
> 
Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	torfl6749@gmail.com, jiri.prchal@aksignal.cz,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v2 1/1] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix residue computation
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:35:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710080542.GD836@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9630cef4224b93939138b3a8c1950ea44cbcf59.1434626239.git.cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 01:25:41PM +0200, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
> As claimed by the programmer datasheet and confirmed by the IP designer,
> the Block Transfer Size (BTSIZE) bitfield of the Channel x Control A
> Register (CTRLAx) always refers to a number of Source Width (SRC_WIDTH)
> transfers.
> 
> Both the SRC_WIDTH and BTSIZE bitfields can be extacted from the CTRLAx
> register to compute the DMA residue. So the 'tx_width' field is useless
> and can be removed from the struct at_desc.
> 
> Before this patch, atc_prep_slave_sg() was not consistent: BTSIZE was
> correctly initialized according to the SRC_WIDTH but 'tx_width' was always
> set to reg_width, which was incorrect for MEM_TO_DEV transfers. It led to
> bad DMA residue when 'tx_width' != SRC_WIDTH.
> 
> Also the 'tx_width' field was mostly set only in the first and last
> descriptors. Depending on the kind of DMA transfer, this field remained
> uninitialized for intermediate descriptors. The accurate DMA residue was
> computed only when the currently processed descriptor was the first or the
> last of the chain. This algorithm was a little bit odd. An accurate DMA
> residue can always be computed using the SRC_WIDTH and BTSIZE bitfields
> in the CTRLAx register.
> 
> Finally, the test to check whether the currently processed descriptor is
> the last of the chain was wrong: for cyclic transfer, last_desc->lli.dscr
> is NOT equal to zero, since set_desc_eol() is never called, but logically
> equal to first_desc->txd.phys. This bug has a side effect on the
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c driver, which uses cyclic DMA transfer
> to receive data. Since the DMA residue was wrong each time the DMA
> transfer reaches the second (and last) period of the transfer, no more
> data were received by the USART driver till the cyclic DMA transfer loops
> back to the first period.
> 
Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-10  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-18 11:25 [PATCH linux-next v2 0/1] dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix residue computation Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-18 11:25 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH linux-next v2 1/1] " Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-18 11:25   ` Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-18 12:09   ` Jiří Prchal
2015-06-18 12:09     ` Jiří Prchal
2015-06-19 13:21     ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-19 13:21       ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-19 14:36       ` Jiří Prchal
2015-06-19 14:36         ` Jiří Prchal
2015-06-29 13:34         ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-29 13:34           ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-19  8:19   ` Torsten Fleischer
2015-06-19  8:19     ` Torsten Fleischer
2015-06-29 13:38   ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-29 13:38     ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-10  8:05   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2015-07-10  8:05     ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150710080542.GD836@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.