From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710151740.GB12489@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37D30B2E9@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:45:32PM +0100, Moore, Robert wrote:
> It's nice that someone took a sizeof() on the struct -- so, one would hope that no code actually depended on a particular value, no?
Unfortunately that sizeof has been there forever (x86/ia64),
ia64 code ran into a similar issue, so the check was removed
to cope with lsapic MADT updates, see:
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c line 204
/*Skip BAD_MADT_ENTRY check, as lsapic size could vary */
Is checking the subtable length field against a static value
really worthwhile/suitable ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei at canonical.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 7:43 AM
> > To: Moore, Robert
> > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J; Linux Kernel Mailing List; linux-arm-
> > kernel; Thomas Gleixner; Jason Cooper; Hanjun Guo
> > Subject: Re: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei at canonical.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:46 AM
> > >> To: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > >> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; linux-arm-kernel; Thomas Gleixner;
> > >> Jason Cooper; Hanjun Guo
> > >> Subject: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Commit 0cff8dc0099f6d4f(ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for MADT
> > >> table.) causes the following failure on APM mustang board(arm64) when
> > >> booting via UEFI and ACPI:
> > >
> > >
> > > I would be interested to know just what exactly about this change broke
> > things.
> >
> > sizeof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt)
> N???????????????r??????y?????????b???X????????v???^???)??{.n???+????????????{????????????zX??????\x17????????}???????????z???&j:+v?????????\a????????????zZ+??????+zf?????????h?????????~????????????i?????????z???\x1e
???w??????????????????????&???)??^[f??????^j??y???m??????@A???a??????\x7f???\f
0??????h???\x0f???i\x7f
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710151740.GB12489@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E37D30B2E9@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:45:32PM +0100, Moore, Robert wrote:
> It's nice that someone took a sizeof() on the struct -- so, one would hope that no code actually depended on a particular value, no?
Unfortunately that sizeof has been there forever (x86/ia64),
ia64 code ran into a similar issue, so the check was removed
to cope with lsapic MADT updates, see:
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c line 204
/*Skip BAD_MADT_ENTRY check, as lsapic size could vary */
Is checking the subtable length field against a static value
really worthwhile/suitable ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei@canonical.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 7:43 AM
> > To: Moore, Robert
> > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J; Linux Kernel Mailing List; linux-arm-
> > kernel; Thomas Gleixner; Jason Cooper; Hanjun Guo
> > Subject: Re: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Moore, Robert <robert.moore@intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ming Lei [mailto:ming.lei@canonical.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 12:46 AM
> > >> To: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > >> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; linux-arm-kernel; Thomas Gleixner;
> > >> Jason Cooper; Hanjun Guo
> > >> Subject: ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Commit 0cff8dc0099f6d4f(ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for MADT
> > >> table.) causes the following failure on APM mustang board(arm64) when
> > >> booting via UEFI and ACPI:
> > >
> > >
> > > I would be interested to know just what exactly about this change broke
> > things.
> >
> > sizeof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt)
> N???????????????r??????y?????????b???X????????v???^???)??{.n???+????????????{????????????zX??????\x17????????}???????????z???&j:+v?????????\a????????????zZ+??????+zf?????????h?????????~????????????i?????????z???\x1e???w??????????????????????&???)??^[f??????^j??y???m??????@A???a??????\x7f???\f0??????h???\x0f???i\x7f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 7:45 ACPI: regression: Failed to initialize GIC IRQ controller Ming Lei
2015-07-10 7:45 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-10 7:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 7:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 8:17 ` Suman Tripathi
2015-07-10 8:17 ` Suman Tripathi
2015-07-10 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 9:37 ` Suman Tripathi
2015-07-10 9:37 ` Suman Tripathi
2015-07-10 10:11 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-10 10:11 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-10 11:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-10 11:10 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-10 10:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-10 10:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-07-10 14:28 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 14:28 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 14:43 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-10 14:43 ` Ming Lei
2015-07-10 14:45 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 14:45 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 15:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-07-10 15:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-10 15:47 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 15:47 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 17:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-10 17:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-10 17:07 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 17:07 ` Moore, Robert
2015-07-10 14:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 14:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-10 14:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-10 14:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150710151740.GB12489@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.