From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Jörg Otte" <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [4.2.0-rc1-00201-g59c3cb5] Regression: kernel NULL pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713062222.GG3736@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxc=Xi1sjM+VFGw9ZR5-awgOy3VkE7goSuEdTJbYWfMGA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 09:52:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000009
> > IP: [<ffffffffbd3447bb>] 0xffffffffbd3447bb
>
> Ugh. Please enable KALLSYMS to get sane symbols.
>
> But yes, "crtc_state->base.active" is at offset 9 from "crtc_state",
> so it's pretty clearly just that change frm
>
> - if (intel_crtc->active) {
> + if (crtc_state->base.active) {
>
> and "crtc_state" is NULL.
>
> And the code very much knows that crtc_state can be NULL, since it's
> initialized with
>
> crtc_state = state->base.state ?
> intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state->base.state,
> intel_crtc) : NULL;
>
> Tssk. Daniel? Should I just revert that commit dec4f799d0a4
> ("drm/i915: Use crtc_state->active in primary check_plane func") for
> now, or is there a better fix? Like just checking crtc_state for NULL?
Indeed embarrassing. I've missed that we still have 1 caller left that's
using the transitional helpers, and those don't fill out
plane_state->state backpointers to the global atomic update since there is
no global atomic update for transitional helpers. Below diff should fix
this - we need to preferentially check crts_state->active and if that's
not set intel_crtc->active should yield the right result for the one
remaining caller (it's in the crtc_disable paths).
For cheap excuses why i915 is so crap in 4.2: Thanks to a hipshot decision
to transition to a different QA team ("we'll do this in 1 week without
upfront planing") I essentially don't have proper QA support for 1-2
months by now. The other trouble in this area specifically is that this
code is already completely changed in -next again, so any testing done on
integration trees (like -next or drm-intel-nightly) won't test any patches
for 4.2.
-Daniel
Oh and Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> in case you
decide to apply this right away.
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index ba9321998a41..85ac6d85dc39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -13276,7 +13276,7 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (crtc_state->base.active) {
+ if (crtc_state ? crtc_state->base.active : intel_crtc->active) {
struct intel_plane_state *old_state =
to_intel_plane_state(plane->state);
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jörg Otte" <jrg.otte@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [4.2.0-rc1-00201-g59c3cb5] Regression: kernel NULL pointer dereference
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:22:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713062222.GG3736@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxc=Xi1sjM+VFGw9ZR5-awgOy3VkE7goSuEdTJbYWfMGA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 09:52:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000009
> > IP: [<ffffffffbd3447bb>] 0xffffffffbd3447bb
>
> Ugh. Please enable KALLSYMS to get sane symbols.
>
> But yes, "crtc_state->base.active" is at offset 9 from "crtc_state",
> so it's pretty clearly just that change frm
>
> - if (intel_crtc->active) {
> + if (crtc_state->base.active) {
>
> and "crtc_state" is NULL.
>
> And the code very much knows that crtc_state can be NULL, since it's
> initialized with
>
> crtc_state = state->base.state ?
> intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state->base.state,
> intel_crtc) : NULL;
>
> Tssk. Daniel? Should I just revert that commit dec4f799d0a4
> ("drm/i915: Use crtc_state->active in primary check_plane func") for
> now, or is there a better fix? Like just checking crtc_state for NULL?
Indeed embarrassing. I've missed that we still have 1 caller left that's
using the transitional helpers, and those don't fill out
plane_state->state backpointers to the global atomic update since there is
no global atomic update for transitional helpers. Below diff should fix
this - we need to preferentially check crts_state->active and if that's
not set intel_crtc->active should yield the right result for the one
remaining caller (it's in the crtc_disable paths).
For cheap excuses why i915 is so crap in 4.2: Thanks to a hipshot decision
to transition to a different QA team ("we'll do this in 1 week without
upfront planing") I essentially don't have proper QA support for 1-2
months by now. The other trouble in this area specifically is that this
code is already completely changed in -next again, so any testing done on
integration trees (like -next or drm-intel-nightly) won't test any patches
for 4.2.
-Daniel
Oh and Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> in case you
decide to apply this right away.
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index ba9321998a41..85ac6d85dc39 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -13276,7 +13276,7 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (crtc_state->base.active) {
+ if (crtc_state ? crtc_state->base.active : intel_crtc->active) {
struct intel_plane_state *old_state =
to_intel_plane_state(plane->state);
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-12 8:03 [4.2.0-rc1-00201-g59c3cb5] Regression: kernel NULL pointer dereference Jörg Otte
2015-07-12 16:33 ` Jörg Otte
2015-07-12 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-12 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-13 5:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 5:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 6:22 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-07-13 6:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-13 7:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 7:23 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 7:42 ` Jörg Otte
2015-07-13 7:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-13 8:50 ` Jörg Otte
2015-07-14 11:00 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not call intel_crtc_disable if the crtc is already disabled Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-14 11:00 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713062222.GG3736@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jrg.otte@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.