From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v3,1/2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:59:09 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150716095909.3C4701402B5@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434022072-31754-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
On Thu, 2015-11-06 at 11:27:51 UTC, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
> says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be
> printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think
> that would be particularly useful in these cases. For consistency with
> most other format strings in the file, use an explicit precision of 16
> and add a 0x prefix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80c394fab89649585089
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 13:26 [PATCH] cxl: Remove useless precision specifiers Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-20 13:26 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-23 3:40 ` Ian Munsie
2015-02-23 6:42 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-23 6:42 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-23 10:55 ` [PATCH v2] cxl: Add explicit " Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-23 10:55 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-02-23 14:59 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-23 14:59 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-24 0:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-02-24 0:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-02-24 4:28 ` Ian Munsie
2015-02-24 4:28 ` Ian Munsie
2015-06-11 11:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Rasmus Villemoes
2015-06-11 11:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cxl: use more common format specifier Rasmus Villemoes
2015-06-12 1:08 ` Ian Munsie
2015-07-16 9:59 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-02-24 4:25 ` [PATCH v2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers Ian Munsie
2015-02-24 4:25 ` Ian Munsie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150716095909.3C4701402B5@ozlabs.org \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.