From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:52:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150716155253.GU7845@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436577547-5646-1-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:19:05PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> This is a followp to previous iteration but implemented on top of VHE patches.
> Only non-VHE path is addressied by this patch. In second patch 32-bit handler
> is updated to keep exit handling consistent with 64-bit code, and nothing
> has changed.
>
Why not simply preserve this the way it was in v3 and have it merged
first - after all we have reviewed it and I thought it was more or less
ready to be merged - I suspect the VHE patches may have a way to go
still ?
-Christoffer
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:52:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150716155253.GU7845@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436577547-5646-1-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:19:05PM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> This is a followp to previous iteration but implemented on top of VHE patches.
> Only non-VHE path is addressied by this patch. In second patch 32-bit handler
> is updated to keep exit handling consistent with 64-bit code, and nothing
> has changed.
>
Why not simply preserve this the way it was in v3 and have it merged
first - after all we have reviewed it and I thought it was more or less
ready to be merged - I suspect the VHE patches may have a way to go
still ?
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-11 1:19 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 non-VHE fpsimd skip 30-50% save/restore on exits Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] keep arm vfp/simd exit handling consistent with arm64 Mario Smarduch
2015-07-11 1:19 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 15:52 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-07-16 15:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm/arm64: KVM: Optimize arm64 fp/simd, saves 30-50% on exits for non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2015-07-16 18:23 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 18:23 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 19:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-16 19:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-16 19:22 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-07-16 19:22 ` Mario Smarduch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150716155253.GU7845@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=m.smarduch@samsung.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.