From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mturquette@baylibre.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mfd: 88pm800: Add support for clk subdevice
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:50:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723155008.GS3436@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437476823-3358-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> This patch adds mfd_cell/clk-subdevice for 88PM800 MFD
> (and family of devices).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> index f104a32..9723eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,14 @@ static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct mfd_cell clk_devs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "88pm80x-clk",
> + .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm800-clk",
> + .id = -1,
> + },
> +};
Why does each device in 88pm800.c have it's own mfd_cell?
Take the opportunity to correct the tabbing in the remainder of the
file. Make that fix-up patch 1 of this set. Then fixup this patch.
> static const struct regmap_irq pm800_irqs[] = {
> /* INT0 */
> [PM800_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
> @@ -344,6 +352,17 @@ static int device_regulator_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> +static int device_clk_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (chip->type == CHIP_PM800)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm800-clk";
> + else if (chip->type == CHIP_PM860)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm860-clk";
> +
> + return mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &clk_devs[0],
> + ARRAY_SIZE(clk_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> {
> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap;
> @@ -513,6 +532,12 @@ static int device_800_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + ret = device_clk_init(chip);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add clk subdev\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
Why do these have to be seperate?
> return 0;
> out_dev:
> mfd_remove_devices(chip->dev);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] mfd: 88pm800: Add support for clk subdevice
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:50:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723155008.GS3436@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437476823-3358-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> This patch adds mfd_cell/clk-subdevice for 88PM800 MFD
> (and family of devices).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> index f104a32..9723eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,14 @@ static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct mfd_cell clk_devs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "88pm80x-clk",
> + .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm800-clk",
> + .id = -1,
> + },
> +};
Why does each device in 88pm800.c have it's own mfd_cell?
Take the opportunity to correct the tabbing in the remainder of the
file. Make that fix-up patch 1 of this set. Then fixup this patch.
> static const struct regmap_irq pm800_irqs[] = {
> /* INT0 */
> [PM800_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
> @@ -344,6 +352,17 @@ static int device_regulator_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> +static int device_clk_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (chip->type == CHIP_PM800)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm800-clk";
> + else if (chip->type == CHIP_PM860)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm860-clk";
> +
> + return mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &clk_devs[0],
> + ARRAY_SIZE(clk_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> {
> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap;
> @@ -513,6 +532,12 @@ static int device_800_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + ret = device_clk_init(chip);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add clk subdev\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
Why do these have to be seperate?
> return 0;
> out_dev:
> mfd_remove_devices(chip->dev);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Vaibhav Hiremath
<vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
k.kozlowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mfd: 88pm800: Add support for clk subdevice
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:50:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723155008.GS3436@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437476823-3358-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> This patch adds mfd_cell/clk-subdevice for 88PM800 MFD
> (and family of devices).
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> index f104a32..9723eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,14 @@ static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static struct mfd_cell clk_devs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "88pm80x-clk",
> + .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm800-clk",
> + .id = -1,
> + },
> +};
Why does each device in 88pm800.c have it's own mfd_cell?
Take the opportunity to correct the tabbing in the remainder of the
file. Make that fix-up patch 1 of this set. Then fixup this patch.
> static const struct regmap_irq pm800_irqs[] = {
> /* INT0 */
> [PM800_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
> @@ -344,6 +352,17 @@ static int device_regulator_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> ARRAY_SIZE(regulator_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> }
>
> +static int device_clk_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (chip->type == CHIP_PM800)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm800-clk";
> + else if (chip->type == CHIP_PM860)
> + clk_devs[0].name = "88pm860-clk";
> +
> + return mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &clk_devs[0],
> + ARRAY_SIZE(clk_devs), NULL, 0, NULL);
> +}
> +
> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> {
> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap;
> @@ -513,6 +532,12 @@ static int device_800_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + ret = device_clk_init(chip);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to add clk subdev\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
Why do these have to be seperate?
> return 0;
> out_dev:
> mfd_remove_devices(chip->dev);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 11:06 [PATCH 0/4] clk: 88pm800: Add new clk provider driver for 88PM800 MFD Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:06 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] mfd: 88pm800: Update the header file with 32K clk related macros Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-23 15:52 ` Lee Jones
2015-08-05 8:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-05 8:53 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add clock subdevice node information Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-23 5:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-23 5:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-30 22:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-30 22:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-30 22:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-30 22:21 ` Rob Herring
2015-07-30 22:21 ` Rob Herring
2015-07-30 22:21 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-05 6:39 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: 88pm800: Add clk provider driver for 88pm800 family of devices Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 19:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 19:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 19:36 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 19:36 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 19:36 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 20:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 20:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-22 6:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-22 6:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-22 6:27 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-22 6:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-22 6:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-22 8:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-22 8:16 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-22 22:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-22 22:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-21 11:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] mfd: 88pm800: Add support for clk subdevice Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-21 11:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-07-23 4:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-23 4:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-23 4:58 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-07-23 15:50 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-07-23 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2015-07-23 15:50 ` Lee Jones
2015-08-05 9:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2015-08-05 9:07 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150723155008.GS3436@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.