All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com" <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
	James Morse <James.Morse@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com" <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
	"zhudacai@hisilicon.com" <zhudacai@hisilicon.com>,
	"zhangjukuo@huawei.com" <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com" <qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong3@huawei.com" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	"qiujiang@huawei.com" <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"kangfenglong@huawei.com" <kangfenglong@huawei.com>,
	"liguozhu@hisilicon.com" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM/PCI: remove align_resource in pci_sys_data
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723180604.GD23324@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437461323-3531-2-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

[CC'ing Thomas and Jason for pci-mvebu]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 07:48:39AM +0100, Zhou Wang wrote:
> This patch is needed in order to unify the PCIe designware framework for ARM and
> ARM64 architectures. In the PCIe designware unification process we are calling
> pci_create_root_bus() passing a "sysdata" parameter that is the same for both
> ARM and ARM64 and is of type "struct pcie_port*". In the ARM case this will
> cause a problem with the function pcibios_align_resource(); in fact this will
> cast "dev->sysdata" to "struct pci_sys_data*", whereas designware had passed a
> "struct pcie_port*" pointer.
> 
> This patch solves the issue by removing "align_resource" from "pci_sys_data"
> struct and defining a static global function pointer in "bios32.c"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

Arnd, Rob any opinion on this ? It is really the last blocking bit
to having common ARM/ARM64 drivers (and get rid of pci_sys_data) so I
would like to get this sorted asap (having a global function pointer
might be a temporary solution before moving it to the host bridge
structure).

Comments welcome.

Thanks !
Lorenzo

> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h |  5 -----
>  arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c        | 12 ++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> index 28b9bb3..8a4e4de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ struct pci_sys_data {
>  					/* IRQ mapping				*/
>  	int		(*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
>  					/* Resource alignement requirements	*/
> -	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> -					  const struct resource *res,
> -					  resource_size_t start,
> -					  resource_size_t size,
> -					  resource_size_t align);
>  	void		*private_data;	/* platform controller private data	*/
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index fcbbbb1..4cdc64d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>  #include <asm/mach/pci.h>
>  
>  static int debug_pci;
> +static resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> +		  const struct resource *res,
> +		  resource_size_t start,
> +		  resource_size_t size,
> +		  resource_size_t align) = NULL;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>  struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -468,7 +473,7 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>  		sys->busnr   = busnr;
>  		sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>  		sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
> -		sys->align_resource = hw->align_resource;
> +		align_resource = hw->align_resource;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sys->resources);
>  
>  		if (hw->private_data)
> @@ -589,7 +594,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  				resource_size_t size, resource_size_t align)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev = data;
> -	struct pci_sys_data *sys = dev->sysdata;
>  	resource_size_t start = res->start;
>  
>  	if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO && start & 0x300)
> @@ -597,8 +601,8 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  
>  	start = (start + align - 1) & ~(align - 1);
>  
> -	if (sys->align_resource)
> -		return sys->align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
> +	if (align_resource)
> +		return align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
>  
>  	return start;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM/PCI: remove align_resource in pci_sys_data
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723180604.GD23324@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437461323-3531-2-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

[CC'ing Thomas and Jason for pci-mvebu]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 07:48:39AM +0100, Zhou Wang wrote:
> This patch is needed in order to unify the PCIe designware framework for ARM and
> ARM64 architectures. In the PCIe designware unification process we are calling
> pci_create_root_bus() passing a "sysdata" parameter that is the same for both
> ARM and ARM64 and is of type "struct pcie_port*". In the ARM case this will
> cause a problem with the function pcibios_align_resource(); in fact this will
> cast "dev->sysdata" to "struct pci_sys_data*", whereas designware had passed a
> "struct pcie_port*" pointer.
> 
> This patch solves the issue by removing "align_resource" from "pci_sys_data"
> struct and defining a static global function pointer in "bios32.c"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

Arnd, Rob any opinion on this ? It is really the last blocking bit
to having common ARM/ARM64 drivers (and get rid of pci_sys_data) so I
would like to get this sorted asap (having a global function pointer
might be a temporary solution before moving it to the host bridge
structure).

Comments welcome.

Thanks !
Lorenzo

> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h |  5 -----
>  arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c        | 12 ++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> index 28b9bb3..8a4e4de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ struct pci_sys_data {
>  					/* IRQ mapping				*/
>  	int		(*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
>  					/* Resource alignement requirements	*/
> -	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> -					  const struct resource *res,
> -					  resource_size_t start,
> -					  resource_size_t size,
> -					  resource_size_t align);
>  	void		*private_data;	/* platform controller private data	*/
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index fcbbbb1..4cdc64d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>  #include <asm/mach/pci.h>
>  
>  static int debug_pci;
> +static resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> +		  const struct resource *res,
> +		  resource_size_t start,
> +		  resource_size_t size,
> +		  resource_size_t align) = NULL;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>  struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -468,7 +473,7 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>  		sys->busnr   = busnr;
>  		sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>  		sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
> -		sys->align_resource = hw->align_resource;
> +		align_resource = hw->align_resource;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sys->resources);
>  
>  		if (hw->private_data)
> @@ -589,7 +594,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  				resource_size_t size, resource_size_t align)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev = data;
> -	struct pci_sys_data *sys = dev->sysdata;
>  	resource_size_t start = res->start;
>  
>  	if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO && start & 0x300)
> @@ -597,8 +601,8 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  
>  	start = (start + align - 1) & ~(align - 1);
>  
> -	if (sys->align_resource)
> -		return sys->align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
> +	if (align_resource)
> +		return align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
>  
>  	return start;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com" <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
	James Morse <James.Morse@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com" <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
	"zhudacai@hisilicon.com" <zhudacai@hisilicon.com>,
	"zhangjukuo@huawei.com" <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com" <qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong3@huawei.com" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	"qiujiang@huawei.com" <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"kangfenglong@huawei.com" <kangfenglong@huawei.com>,
	"liguozhu@hisilicon.com" <liguozhu@hisilico>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM/PCI: remove align_resource in pci_sys_data
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 19:06:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723180604.GD23324@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437461323-3531-2-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

[CC'ing Thomas and Jason for pci-mvebu]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 07:48:39AM +0100, Zhou Wang wrote:
> This patch is needed in order to unify the PCIe designware framework for ARM and
> ARM64 architectures. In the PCIe designware unification process we are calling
> pci_create_root_bus() passing a "sysdata" parameter that is the same for both
> ARM and ARM64 and is of type "struct pcie_port*". In the ARM case this will
> cause a problem with the function pcibios_align_resource(); in fact this will
> cast "dev->sysdata" to "struct pci_sys_data*", whereas designware had passed a
> "struct pcie_port*" pointer.
> 
> This patch solves the issue by removing "align_resource" from "pci_sys_data"
> struct and defining a static global function pointer in "bios32.c"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>

Arnd, Rob any opinion on this ? It is really the last blocking bit
to having common ARM/ARM64 drivers (and get rid of pci_sys_data) so I
would like to get this sorted asap (having a global function pointer
might be a temporary solution before moving it to the host bridge
structure).

Comments welcome.

Thanks !
Lorenzo

> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h |  5 -----
>  arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c        | 12 ++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> index 28b9bb3..8a4e4de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,6 @@ struct pci_sys_data {
>  					/* IRQ mapping				*/
>  	int		(*map_irq)(const struct pci_dev *, u8, u8);
>  					/* Resource alignement requirements	*/
> -	resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> -					  const struct resource *res,
> -					  resource_size_t start,
> -					  resource_size_t size,
> -					  resource_size_t align);
>  	void		*private_data;	/* platform controller private data	*/
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index fcbbbb1..4cdc64d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@
>  #include <asm/mach/pci.h>
>  
>  static int debug_pci;
> +static resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
> +		  const struct resource *res,
> +		  resource_size_t start,
> +		  resource_size_t size,
> +		  resource_size_t align) = NULL;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>  struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -468,7 +473,7 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>  		sys->busnr   = busnr;
>  		sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>  		sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
> -		sys->align_resource = hw->align_resource;
> +		align_resource = hw->align_resource;
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sys->resources);
>  
>  		if (hw->private_data)
> @@ -589,7 +594,6 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  				resource_size_t size, resource_size_t align)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *dev = data;
> -	struct pci_sys_data *sys = dev->sysdata;
>  	resource_size_t start = res->start;
>  
>  	if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO && start & 0x300)
> @@ -597,8 +601,8 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
>  
>  	start = (start + align - 1) & ~(align - 1);
>  
> -	if (sys->align_resource)
> -		return sys->align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
> +	if (align_resource)
> +		return align_resource(dev, res, start, size, align);
>  
>  	return start;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-23 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21  6:48 [PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: hisi: Add PCIe host support for Hisilicon Soc Hip05 Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM/PCI: remove align_resource in pci_sys_data Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21 22:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 22:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-22  2:00     ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:00       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:00       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-23 18:06   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-07-23 18:06     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-23 18:06     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-21  6:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: hisi: Add PCIe host support for Hisilicon Soc Hip05 Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21 22:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 22:37     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-22  2:33     ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:33       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:33       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Documentation: DT: Add Hisilicon PCIe host binding Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21 23:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-21 23:02     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-22  2:50     ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:50       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-22  2:50       ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add pcie-hisi maintainer Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang
2015-07-21  6:48   ` Zhou Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150723180604.GD23324@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Morse@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiujiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhudacai@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.