From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
To: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>,
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>,
Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com, b20596@freescale.com,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
r64343@freescale.com, b20788@freescale.com, shawn.guo@linaro.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: remove duplicated code with __clk_set_parent_after
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:11:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150724001135.642.54711@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150722140809.GC13623@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net>
Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-07-22 07:08:10)
> Ping...
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:29:56PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:25:24PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:09:19PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > > Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-05-14 06:28:59)
> > > > > __clk_set_parent_after() actually used the second argument then we
> > > > > could put this duplicate logic in there and call it with a different
> > > > > order of arguments in the success vs. error paths in this function.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
> > > >
> > > > Patch looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Also just noticed that the second argument to __clk_set_parent_after is
> > > > never used :-(
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ping...
> > >
> > > I did not see this patch series in your tree for v4.2 rc.
> > > Is this got missed?
Dong Aisheng,
Yes it was missed. My apologies. Can you refresh it and re-send?
Thanks,
Mike
> > >
> >
> > Updated Mike's email address.
> >
> > Regards
> > Dong Aisheng
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Dong Aisheng
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +-------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > index 659f2b0..0e813ea 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > @@ -1159,14 +1159,8 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent,
> > > > > flags = clk_enable_lock();
> > > > > clk_reparent(core, old_parent);
> > > > > clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > > > > + __clk_set_parent_after(core, old_parent, parent);
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (core->prepare_count) {
> > > > > - flags = clk_enable_lock();
> > > > > - clk_core_disable(core);
> > > > > - clk_core_disable(parent);
> > > > > - clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > > > > - clk_core_unprepare(parent);
> > > > > - }
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.9.1
> > > > >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mturquette@baylibre.com (Michael Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: remove duplicated code with __clk_set_parent_after
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:11:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150724001135.642.54711@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150722140809.GC13623@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net>
Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-07-22 07:08:10)
> Ping...
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:29:56PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:25:24PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:09:19PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > > Quoting Dong Aisheng (2015-05-14 06:28:59)
> > > > > __clk_set_parent_after() actually used the second argument then we
> > > > > could put this duplicate logic in there and call it with a different
> > > > > order of arguments in the success vs. error paths in this function.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@freescale.com>
> > > >
> > > > Patch looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Also just noticed that the second argument to __clk_set_parent_after is
> > > > never used :-(
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ping...
> > >
> > > I did not see this patch series in your tree for v4.2 rc.
> > > Is this got missed?
Dong Aisheng,
Yes it was missed. My apologies. Can you refresh it and re-send?
Thanks,
Mike
> > >
> >
> > Updated Mike's email address.
> >
> > Regards
> > Dong Aisheng
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Dong Aisheng
> > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 +-------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > index 659f2b0..0e813ea 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > @@ -1159,14 +1159,8 @@ static int __clk_set_parent(struct clk_core *core, struct clk_core *parent,
> > > > > flags = clk_enable_lock();
> > > > > clk_reparent(core, old_parent);
> > > > > clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > > > > + __clk_set_parent_after(core, old_parent, parent);
> > > > >
> > > > > - if (core->prepare_count) {
> > > > > - flags = clk_enable_lock();
> > > > > - clk_core_disable(core);
> > > > > - clk_core_disable(parent);
> > > > > - clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > > > > - clk_core_unprepare(parent);
> > > > > - }
> > > > > return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.9.1
> > > > >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 13:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:28 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: remove duplicated code with __clk_set_parent_after Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:28 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-28 4:09 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-28 4:09 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-28 4:09 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-28 8:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-28 8:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:25 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-15 12:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-22 14:08 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-22 14:08 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-24 0:11 ` Michael Turquette [this message]
2015-07-24 0:11 ` Michael Turquette
2015-07-24 3:23 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-07-24 3:23 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: introduce clk_core_enable_lock and clk_core_disable_lock functions Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: move clk_disable_unused after clk_core_disable_unprepare function Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: core: add CLK_OPS_PARENT_ON flags to support clocks require parent on Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] " Dong Aisheng
2015-05-14 13:29 ` Dong Aisheng
2015-05-20 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] clk: support clocks which requires parent clock on during operation Dong Aisheng
2015-05-20 11:42 ` Dong Aisheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150724001135.642.54711@quantum \
--to=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@freescale.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@freescale.com \
--cc=b20596@freescale.com \
--cc=b20788@freescale.com \
--cc=b29396@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r64343@freescale.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.