From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Salter <msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Matt Fleming
<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150728220640.GF2773@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_EtOV8wannMLG87ai_x3ARu4rUSo9D6w2DQ+Kb5Kjn-A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 28 Jul, at 11:24:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> This workaround fixes another issue as well: the arm64 kernel needs to
> be loaded 512 KB above a 2MB aligned boundary, and using
> efi_low_alloc() as we do loses (2 MB - 512 KB) at the bottom if part
> of that 512 KB is occupied, since efi_low_alloc() is not aware of the
> fact that the first 512 KB will remain unused.
>
> What would be most helpful is if efi_low_alloc() could take an offset
> param in addition to the alignment, i.e., alignment == 2MB and offset
> == 512 KB. The offset would default to 0, reverting to the original
> behavior.
>
> If you'd be ok with such a change, I can propose it instead, and wire
> it up into this function.
It's probably because it's late but I'm having trouble thinking this
change through fully.
If it's not too much work, sure, please go ahead and propose a patch,
even the untested, uncompiled "this is what I'm thinking" type.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64/efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150728220640.GF2773@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_EtOV8wannMLG87ai_x3ARu4rUSo9D6w2DQ+Kb5Kjn-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul, at 11:24:23PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> This workaround fixes another issue as well: the arm64 kernel needs to
> be loaded 512 KB above a 2MB aligned boundary, and using
> efi_low_alloc() as we do loses (2 MB - 512 KB) at the bottom if part
> of that 512 KB is occupied, since efi_low_alloc() is not aware of the
> fact that the first 512 KB will remain unused.
>
> What would be most helpful is if efi_low_alloc() could take an offset
> param in addition to the alignment, i.e., alignment == 2MB and offset
> == 512 KB. The offset would default to 0, reverting to the original
> behavior.
>
> If you'd be ok with such a change, I can propose it instead, and wire
> it up into this function.
It's probably because it's late but I'm having trouble thinking this
change through fully.
If it's not too much work, sure, please go ahead and propose a patch,
even the untested, uncompiled "this is what I'm thinking" type.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-28 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-24 11:38 [PATCH v2] arm64/efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux Ard Biesheuvel
2015-07-24 11:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1437737907-10477-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-24 13:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-24 13:04 ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-28 21:17 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-28 21:17 ` Matt Fleming
[not found] ` <20150728211752.GE2773-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-28 21:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-07-28 21:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu_EtOV8wannMLG87ai_x3ARu4rUSo9D6w2DQ+Kb5Kjn-A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-28 22:06 ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2015-07-28 22:06 ` Matt Fleming
2015-07-29 10:27 ` Will Deacon
2015-07-29 10:27 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-27 21:15 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-27 21:15 ` Timur Tabi
[not found] <55B0D4E4.9030403@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <55B0D4E4.9030403-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-23 13:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150728220640.GF2773@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--to=matt-mf/unelci9gs6ibeejttw/xrex20p6io@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.