From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
To: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
<daniel.sanders@imgtec.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
<cernekee@gmail.com>, <Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com>,
<geert+renesas@glider.be>, <david.daney@cavium.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, <behanw@converseincode.com>,
<macro@linux-mips.org>, <cl@linux.com>, <pkarat@mvista.com>,
<linux@roeck-us.net>, <tkhai@yandex.ru>, <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
<alexinbeijing@gmail.com>, <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
<Steven.Hill@imgtec.com>, <lars.persson@axis.com>,
<aleksey.makarov@auriga.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ralf@linux-mips.org>, <luto@amacapital.net>,
<dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>,
<eunb.song@samsung.com>, <kumba@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] MIPS: set stack/data protection as non-executable
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:40:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806004032.GA24016@NP-P-BURTON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C2A91B.1090704@imgtec.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:23:55PM -0700, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> It is actually any application which requests non-executable stack
> protection and needs some emulation BEFORE GLIBC cancels that non-executable
> stack protection due to libraries.
>
> If you build all libraries with PT_GNU_STACK 'non-executable' and use
> application with the same protection then you can't emulate even a single
> instruction - it crashes immediately. So, it is not a bad application, it is
> a bad choice for emulation space in past.
...snip...
> Create a buildroot FS with PT_GNU_STACK 'non-executable' libraries. Then run
> ssh_keygen on CPU without FPU and look.
>
> You also may try to run MIPS R2 Debian on MIPS R6 CPU, and see a spectacular
> failure of ssh_keygen (it tries to emulate MIPS R2 instruction before first
> library is loaded and that fails due to non-executable stack protection.
All of that sounds like perfectly valid reasons to move the FP branch
delay emulation away from using the stack, which we absolutely do need
to do. They do not however justify changing the default flags & breaking
backwards compatibility.
Thanks,
Paul
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
To: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
daniel.sanders@imgtec.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
cernekee@gmail.com, Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com,
geert+renesas@glider.be, david.daney@cavium.com,
peterz@infradead.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, behanw@converseincode.com,
macro@linux-mips.org, cl@linux.com, pkarat@mvista.com,
linux@roeck-us.net, tkhai@yandex.ru, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
alexinbeijing@gmail.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
Steven.Hill@imgtec.com, lars.persson@axis.com,
aleksey.makarov@auriga.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, luto@amacapital.net,
dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, markos.chandras@imgtec.com,
eunb.song@samsung.com, kumba@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] MIPS: set stack/data protection as non-executable
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:40:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806004032.GA24016@NP-P-BURTON> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150806004032.n-18CwXqh6y_7JxeA7xbtqfJeruRhur87h2D9VVFP6s@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C2A91B.1090704@imgtec.com>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:23:55PM -0700, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
> It is actually any application which requests non-executable stack
> protection and needs some emulation BEFORE GLIBC cancels that non-executable
> stack protection due to libraries.
>
> If you build all libraries with PT_GNU_STACK 'non-executable' and use
> application with the same protection then you can't emulate even a single
> instruction - it crashes immediately. So, it is not a bad application, it is
> a bad choice for emulation space in past.
...snip...
> Create a buildroot FS with PT_GNU_STACK 'non-executable' libraries. Then run
> ssh_keygen on CPU without FPU and look.
>
> You also may try to run MIPS R2 Debian on MIPS R6 CPU, and see a spectacular
> failure of ssh_keygen (it tries to emulate MIPS R2 instruction before first
> library is loaded and that fails due to non-executable stack protection.
All of that sounds like perfectly valid reasons to move the FP branch
delay emulation away from using the stack, which we absolutely do need
to do. They do not however justify changing the default flags & breaking
backwards compatibility.
Thanks,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 23:49 [PATCH v4 0/3] MIPS executable stack protection Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] MIPS: mips_flush_cache_range is added Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] MIPS: Setup an instruction emulation in VDSO protected page instead of user stack Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] MIPS: set stack/data protection as non-executable Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:49 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-05 23:55 ` Paul Burton
2015-08-05 23:55 ` Paul Burton
2015-08-06 0:06 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:06 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:14 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:14 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:23 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:23 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:37 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:37 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:46 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:46 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 1:07 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 1:07 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:40 ` Paul Burton [this message]
2015-08-06 0:40 ` Paul Burton
2015-08-05 23:55 ` David Daney
2015-08-05 23:55 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] MIPS executable stack protection David Daney
2015-08-06 0:00 ` David Daney
2015-08-06 0:02 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-08-06 0:02 ` Leonid Yegoshin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150806004032.GA24016@NP-P-BURTON \
--to=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com \
--cc=Steven.Hill@imgtec.com \
--cc=Zubair.Kakakhel@imgtec.com \
--cc=aleksey.makarov@auriga.com \
--cc=alexinbeijing@gmail.com \
--cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.sanders@imgtec.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=eunb.song@samsung.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=lars.persson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=markos.chandras@imgtec.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pkarat@mvista.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.